There are no FEMA camps and anyone who believes that not to be the case is a conspiracy theorist who wears a tin foil hat. The government has no interest in building detention facilities for innocent American citizens who simply have strong political views such as being a Ron Paul supporter, supporting the Constitution, supporting the Second Amendment and advocating for enforcement of the Tenth Amendment. America has the First Amendment and that right is zealously protected by the politicians in Washington DC. Can we please move on to something worthwhile to talk about? Doesn’t our country have enough to worry about rather than to engage in wild-eyed fantasies regarding some remote conspiracy about FEMA camps?
Americans should sleep securely in their beds knowing that the specter of concentration camps of Nazi Germany will never be visited upon Americans for simply being the wrong race, being the wrong religion or having the wrong political views. For goodness sake, even Congressman Steve Cohen (D) from Tennessee, stated on Jesse Ventura’s show, Conspiracy Theory, that there are no FEMA camps. Please visit the clip below and forward to 9:40 and listen to Congressman Cohen’s indignant denial in which Cohen attacks would-be conspiracy ‘theorists’ claiming that only those who believe in little green men and interstellar war would believe such things as the existence of FEMA camps.
After viewing Cohen’s strong denial about the existence of FEMA camps, I am confused. Cohen is a co-conspirator, I mean co-sponsor of HR bill 645, which clearly mandates that creation of FEMA camps, yet he completely denies their existence. Of course, as with most government officials I would suppose that the American public should believe what a politician says and not what he does. I contacted Congressman Cohen’s office and they are refusing comment on these blatant inconsistencies. And one more thing, why was Jesse Ventura’s Conspiracy Theory show banned by the media at the behest of Homeland Security?
In a case of that was then and this is now, there has been a stunning development with regard to the corporate controlled media reporting on FEMA camps. CBS News reported on November 10, 2012, that FEMA camps are in place and being used to house victims of super storm Sandy.
The FEMA shelter camp taped in the accompanying video link is home for victims of Sandy and is located in Oceanport, New Jersey. This camp is taking on the look of permanence as it contains 40 acres of emergency housing and is located in the parking lot of a race track. The camp is complete with hot meals and hot showers. The CBS report interviews a representative of FEMA who sells the camp as a refuge for first responders to the storm and then at the end of the interview, as an afterthought, acknowledges that 200+ storm victims also live there now with more showing up every day.
Reporters are not permitted to enter the FEMA facility amid reports that the “new residents” are reporting that the heating, food and general overall comfort of the camp is not as good as people report. People also report that they are able to see their breath as the temperatures are in the low 30’s.
The following excerpts speak as to why federal agencies hire spokespersons. FEMA Camp spokesperson, Scott Sanders must have been absent from work the day that Reed Kozlow was interviewed by a local reporter. “You hover around waiting for the call. When the phone rings I can go. It’s all about the group,” said one of the FEMA workers at the camp, Reed Kozlow. Kozlow went on to state that “Whatever a community needs we provide. For Sandy we set up 12 camps to help.” The Koslow statement is very interesting, because the CBS report leaves the viewer with the impression that this was a single FEMA camp facility and an isolated incident. Yet, Kozlow admits that there is a camp in Meriden, Connecticut, where he brought in big generators, “as big as pickup trucks” with many odds and ends which he compared to setting up a small city complete with light and heat for the victims. And curiously, he admitted to installing fencing around the camp. Fencing? Why would a “FEMA rescue camp” need fencing? The better question is, why would they be keeping people out? And why would that be the case, since they are a rescue facility? The more likely scenario is what Jesse Ventura found in Texas where the double fenced property had its barbed wire point in which is a clear indicator that the facility was designed to keep people in against their will. The intelligence data used to compile an “enemies of the state” list is featured below.
Between Routes 1 and 9 from Woodbridge to Linden remembers Linden Airport, and the General Motors plant right across the narrow lanes of the highway.
FEMA spokesman Scott Sanders at first denied that his agency had anything to do with the white tent city. “We might provide provisions, but we don’t run shelters,” after Sanders was asked if the tents were to be used for people displaced by Sandy.
Across the Arthur Kill from Woodbridge, Staten Island residents in which several were left homeless after last week’s hurricane and storm surge, are taking refuge in a huge FEMA camp facility. There was a large GM plant on the route which was torn down in 2008 to make way for a building renewal project which has not yet gotten off the ground. Yet, there is some building going on in this area as an encampment comprised of wooden poles and white tent bunting are apparent to anyone who drives by. The area is being described as a gigantic tent city, staffed with guards, fencing, and gates. There are water trucks, vehicles for portable showers, and more raw materials ostensibly to used for more construction. What about that FEMA camp spokesperson Scott Sanders?
According to the Staten Island Advance, FEMA officials are looking into reopening an old prison facility in which they would house storm victims in the Linden, New Jersey area. Yet, FEMA spokesperson Sanders, true to his FEMA moniker of continuing to deny that FEMA would ever construct and operate a camp of any type, instructed reporters to contact the Red Cross to find out what the tent city is for. Well, I did call the Red Cross three times and they said that they have nobody available to speak to a national talk show host about this issue. They seemed confused at the Red Cross when I asked them about the Linden, NJ facility. I started feeling dizzy when the Red Cross secretary I spoke with suggested that I contact FEMA. I hope if there are any fences around the Red Cross facility that they bars are pointed in.
Even local officials, such as Linden Police Officer Ted Miller, stated that FEMA is in charge of the FEMA facility at Linden citing a document FEMA had provided to the Linden Police Department.
In an interview by a local reporter, Miller stated that the tent city is set up to house 500 people citing the FEMA document However, a recent story at mycentraljersey.com said that the encampment would hold up to 4,000 utility workers. Which is it Mr. FEMA camp spokesperson Sanders, now that you finally admitted that the FEMA camp exists, is it a 500 person capacity or 4,000 inmate, err, person capacity? I would understand FEMA constructing facilities to help the storm victims, but why lie about it? Mr. Sanders has an excellent future with this government agency because of his shape-shifting Teflon approach to the truth. It is abundantly clear that we are seeing the roll out, under the guise of a disaster response, the first known populated FEMA Camps. As the Obamanites say, “Never let a good crisis go to waste.”
I previously wrote an article in response to the intention of Congress to permit the military to indefinitely detain, without due process protections, American citizens for any reason, or for no reason whatsoever. In the previous article, I referenced the leaked memo from KBR manager, Bob Siefert, which was informing subcontractors to be prepared within 72 hours of notification to provide essential services to FEMA camps such as the installation of barbwire, blockades, personnel, food, water and sanitation services. Subsequently, one of my readers, Richard Firth, bravely took the initiative to write to Siefert and asked him to explain his stated intentions in the leaked memo. Below is the exchange between Wirth and Siefert along with my analysis.
From: Richard w. Firth