gun confiscationThe attacks on the Second Amendment, by government, has extended to persecuting a decorated war hero and charging him with five counts of third degree criminal possession of a weapon, for having completely empty 30 round AR-15 Magazines in his vehicle.

On January 6, 2013, a decorated combat veteran, Staff Sergeant Nathan Haddad, was driving through Jefferson County, New York when he was randomly pulled over at a Fourth Amendment violating warrantless vehicle checkpoint search. Haddad, who had five 30 round empty magazines in his vehicle, was arrested by the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department and was charged with five separate felonies. If convicted on all counts, Haddad, could spend the majority of the rest of his life in prison.

When Nathan Haddad was arrested the new ban on his gun magazines had not yet taken effect.  The ignoramuses’ at the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department should be given a civics homework assignment, namely, look up the term, ex post facto. In other words, the government cannot pass a law which makes a past act, prior to a new law taking effect, illegal. But I forget, this is the new America and we are clearly in the midst of adopting totalitarian laws and law enforcement practices which are serving to replace our Constitution (e.g. the NDAA).

gun control nathanhaddadIronically, Haddad was recently honored by the Philadelphia chapter of Blue Star Mothers and the Union League’s Armed Services Council for helping disabled veterans get back on their feet and this is how the Jefferson County Sheriff’s office honors his service to his country and later, to his community.

A legal relief fund has been set up to help Sergeant Haddad fight against the tyrants in New York. I would encourage all to donate what they can.

Gun control laws are not meant to stop criminals. Gun control is about control and about disarming the American people because there are some very bad people who wish to do middle class Americans great harm. America needs to wake up and see gun control for what it is; gun control is most often a precursor to absolute tyranny and often culminates in genocide.

If this government was truly sincere about making the country safer, they would be corralling and controlling the reckless and negligent medical-pharmaceutical industrial complex. The present medical statistics demonstrate that death by doctor dwarfs death by gunfire as the following chart demonstrates.

 

Rank                                             Causes of Death  (2010)                                           # of Deaths

1

Heart disease

597,689

2

Cancer

574,743

3

Medically caused deaths

225,000

4

Chronic lower respiratory diseases

138,080

5

Stroke

129,476

6

Accidents

120, 859

7

Alzheimer’s

83, 494

8

                              Diabetes

69,071

9

Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome

50,476

10

Influenza and Pneumonia

50,094

???

Death by Firearm

9,601

In 2010, there were 14,043 homicides in the United States. This was 15th leading cause of death according to the CDC mortality statistics and a Wall Street Journal review for causes of death. However, when one isolates the number of deaths by firearms,  the number of deaths caused by guns drops to 9,601. Gunfire, as a cause of mortality is not even ranked among the leading causes of death. The likelihood of being killed in a mass shooting are about what they are for being struck by lightning.

monsantoLet’s take a moment to examine the leading causes of death and the possible reasons underlying the mortality statistics. Perhaps we should be looking at the Bovine Growth Hormones (cancer causing) put into cattle which makes its way into the human population by way of meat and milk consumption. We ingest these dangerous substances and literally, the entire country is on a secondary form of steroids. Subsequently, massive rates of obesity have beset our nation and not one word of discussion on this topic has taken place in the mainstream media or in the halls of Congress. Maybe the country should question the wisdom of taking the flu vaccine. There is not one shred of scientific evidence which supports the use of the vaccine which would serve to justify the hundreds of thousands adverse reactions. The use of the flu vaccine defies conventional wisdom. How does one make up a vaccine a year before the “new” strain appears. Is this medicine by crystal ball? And where is the supportive data? With this kind of voodoo science, no wonder death by doctor is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Also, contributing to our demise, in these areas, are the massive amounts of untested, unregulated and unlabeled GMO’s in which we have seen massive cancerous tumors were developed by rats raised on a GMO diet. Monsanto has bought out and is controlling the FDA and the CDC and subsequently is allowed to avoid all reviews of its products and food safety. Finally when we take a look at chemtrails, perhaps we would be wise to be looking for a link between barium, found in chemtrails, and barium’s prevalence as a causal agent in the development of Alzheimer’s.

With Obamacare being fully implemented, complete with age-related rationing, a reasonable person would expect these medically induced mortality numbers to skyrocket!

When one steps back and looks at the medical-pharmaceutical industrial complex, it is clear that what is supposed to cure us, all too often kills us. Meanwhile, America stays fixated on gun control as a means to increase safety and longevity when the data does not support this illogical, unproven and unconstitutional action. Meanwhile, an examination of the causes of death in the medical industry, as related by the Starfield Report, demonstrates the extreme danger posed to nation’s health and well-being by the medical-pharmaceutical industrial complex.

The Journal American Medical Association

Barbara Starfield

                        Medical Cause of Death                                                     Annual Number of Deaths

Deaths from medication errors in hospitals

7,000

Deaths from unnecessary surgeries

12,000

Deaths from other errors in hospitals

20,000

Deaths from infections acquired in hospitals

80,000

Deaths from FDA-approved correctly prescribed medicines

106,000

Total of medically-caused deaths in the US every year

225,000

It is clear that America’s annual mortality rate would decline significantly if the government were to ban doctors instead of attempting to ban guns. The medical system is a far greater threat to our nation’s health and welfare than are firearms. An American has a 23 times greater chance of being killed by their doctor than by a firearm!

Incidents of mass murder in the U.S. declined from 42 in the 1990s to 26 in the first decade of this century. Head of the Police Chiefs of America, John Lott offers a final damning statistic which serves to indict the illogical beliefs underlying gun control: “With just one single exception, the attack on congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson in 2011, every public shooting since at least 1950 in the U.S. in which more than three people have been killed has taken place where citizens are not allowed to carry guns.” School shootings actually peaked in 1929, but we would not want to confuse Obama and his minions with the facts. Meanwhile, our inane gun policies persecute heroes like Sergeant Haddad as he is clearly being made an example of, by the government, to thwart the rising tide of anti-government sentiment over the gun control issue. In other words, the Haddad case is designed to frighten law-abiding citizens into giving up their guns.

The United States is in the process of criminalizing the act of self-defense by removing the only equalizer that Americans have for self-defense against an attacker or to fend off a tyrannical government. It is safe to say, that we are committing national suicide by gun control.

Recommended Readings

British NHS Euthanizes the Elderly and Obamacare Follows Suit

Back to the Future: What History Teaches About Gun Confiscations

You Are Playing In a Game With No Rules

Ban the Pills, Not the Guns

My 20 Minutes With Globalist Whore, Michael Moore

Gun Free Zones Are Where Victims Go to Die

 

By | 2017-10-26T22:15:53+00:00 February 3rd, 2013|Martial Law|3 Comments

About the Author:

3 Comments

  1. mova manson February 3, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    what s scary article !! you Americans need to be stronger to take down this system .

  2. cindy February 5, 2013 at 10:48 am

    Thanks again Dave for this important article!
    This is the REAL reason for Obama Care, because people are waking up to these FACTS!!
    Major Corporations stand to lose MASSIVE PROFITS, because people are choosing
    HOLISTIC TREATMENT, over there POISONS!
    Holistic medicine IS NOT covered in Obama Care!
    So you will have to pay for Obama Care, AND have to pay for HOLISTIC CARE on TOP of that!!
    America has turned into ONE BIG SCAM, thanks to these Big corporations who BOUGHT America!!
    HOLD your GROUND, stay healthy, and use HOLISTIC METHODS ANYWAY!!
    TO NOT support these EVIL corporations!! DON’T buy there poisons!!

  3. Shirley De February 6, 2013 at 3:16 pm

    WE NEED TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT TO INFORM THEM, “WE THE PEOPLE DO NOT GIVE THEM THE RIGHT TO TEST BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL AGENTS ON THE POPULATION”.

    Shirley De

    Fw: PUBLIC LAW 105-85-NOV. 18.1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
    Show Details

    From

    Shirley DeMay

    BCC

    Barbara and Bob Nelson
    Bob Williams
    Bruce and Lisa Sterling
    Chris A Cyhaniuk
    Ed Martin
    54 More…

    Greetings to All Who Care About NOT BEING USED AS A GUINEA PIG BY UNCLE SAM,

    The deception and informed consent should be enough to win in court and stop the spraying. You have informed them that you do not care to have the spraying done to the area in which you reside. I know they will stall or do whatever they can to delay change.

    I was going to write a letter stating, This is to inform you, I do not consent to Chemical and Biological Agent Testing, (PUBLIC LAW 105-85-NOV. 18, 1997.

    This is notification to the United States of America to cease and desist this CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL AGENT TESTING on me. You do not have my consent to test any chemicals or biological agents.

    The area I live and reside and travel is. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

    What do you say about getting a petition going?

    Shirley DeMay
    2020 Cherokee Street
    St. Louis, Missouri 63118-3239
    314 771-6483

    Please respond with your opinion on this idea. This should be posted on Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc.. It should be sent by email to as many people in all countries to inform the United States Government we are not their GUINEA PIGS!!!

    Please respond with your opinion.

    Shirley DeMay

    U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on “Civilian Population”

    Quote:
    PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS

    SEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.

    (a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)

    (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or
    (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

    (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

    (1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
    (2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
    (3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.

    So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.

    Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).

    In Other Words:
    The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.

    The Following Should Also Be Noted
    The term “biological agent” as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:

    Quote:
    (e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term
    ‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
    viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
    and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
    component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
    whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
    of causing—
    (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
    human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
    (2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
    materials of any kind; or
    (3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

    In Other Words:
    The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term “deleterious alteration of the environment” brings chemtrails to mind.

    Read about actual human chemical testing programs currently in operation:
    http://herballure.com/chemtrails

    Read the full text of this law here. Page 287 contains the above excerpt.:
    Public Law 105-85

    Informed Consent

    Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without “informed consent”, as stated in section (c), which reads:

    Quote:
    (c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense
    may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.

    Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified “in advance” if this “testing” is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.

    Why not?

    Because you’ve already been “informed in advance” and you’ve already given your “consent”.

    Because this “law” is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been “informed”. Because you have not contested it (that’s what the courts are for), you have provided your “consent”.

    This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it’s called “acquiescence”. Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.

    Acquiesce: “submit or comply silently or without protest”

    So, when this law was published, you were “informed”. Because you have not challenged it in court, you have “consented”. By your own inaction, you have said, “Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it.”

    Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of “remedy” and “recourse”, it is legally binding.

    Judges like to say: “Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. They say this because you are expected to know all of the “law” because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).

    So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only “seems” to. Section (c)’s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.

    Deception

    Section (c) of this “law” is very deceptive because most people don’t understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this “testing” will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.

    The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered.

    The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission.

    When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.

Comments are closed.