Many questions have been asked about the speed in which Ebola appears to be spreading. What began as a virus originally isolated to the remote parts of West Africa, has suddenly become an epidemic and drastic measures are beginning to be put in place.
So how is it spreading so quickly?
Is it spread by vaccines?
Many believe that the Ebola virus is being spread by the widespread use of of vaccines, in the same way that AIDS was spread many years ago.
We know that AIDS was originally introduced and spread by vaccination, after a recording of a meeting between Professor Maurice Hilleman, the former Chief of the Merck Pharmaceutical Companies Vaccine Division and his colleagues, was leaked onto the Internet.
Thanks to that recording, we can hear for ourselves Hilleman explaining to his colleagues exactly how the AIDS virus was spread. During the meeting he told colleagues:
“Well, that was at Merck. Yeah, I came to Merck. And uh, I was going to develop vaccines. And we had wild viruses in those days. You remember the wild monkey kidney viruses and so forth? And I finally after 6 months gave up and said that you cannot develop vaccines with these damn monkeys, we’re finished and if I can’t do something I’m going to quit, I’m not going to try it. So I went down to see Bill Mann at the zoo in Washington DC and I told Bill Mann, I said “look, I got a problem and I don’t know what the hell to do.” Bill Mann is a real bright guy. I said that these lousy monkeys are picking it up while being stored in the airports in transit, loading, off loading. He said, very simply, you go ahead and get your monkeys out of West Africa and get the African Green, bring them into Madrid unload them there, there is no other traffic there for animals, fly them into Philadelphia and pick them up. Or fly them into New York and pick them up, right off the airplane. So we brought African Greens in and I didn’t know we were importing the AIDS virus at the time.”
Hilleman also admitted that many of the vaccines given to Americans were known to be contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses.
This being the case it is entirely possible that the similar method could be used to spread Ebola, however, one scientist believes that there is a far more effective way than vaccination to spread the deadly virus and during a speech that he gave to scientists at the Texas Academy of Science he explains how.
Airborne Ebola Preferred Method of Extermination
According to a report published by News Weekly in 2006, Professor Erik Pianka received a standing ovation for a speech that he gave to scientists attending the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science.
During his speech on population control, he told scientists that his preferred method of exterminating over five billion human beings was via airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and kills its victims in days rather than years.
John Ballantyne who reported on the events that took place at the time, wrote:
“Something curious occurred a minute before Pianka began speaking. An official of the Academy approached a video camera operator at the front of the auditorium and engaged him in animated conversation. The camera operator did not look pleased as he pointed the lens of the big camera to the ceiling and slowly walked away.
“This curious incident came to mind a few minutes later when Professor Pianka began his speech by explaining that the general public is not yet ready to hear what he was about to tell us. Because of many years of experience as a writer and editor, Pianka’s strange introduction and the TV camera incident raised a red flag in my mind … I grabbed a notepad …” (“Meeting Doctor Doom”, The Citizen Scientist, March 31, 2006).
Pianka began his speech by condemning anthropocentrism, or the idea that the human race occupies a privileged position in nature. He exclaimed, “We’re no better than bacteria!”
He argued that the sharp increase in the human population since the onset of industrialization was destroying the planet. He warned that Earth would not survive unless its human population was reduced to a tenth of its present number.
He then offered drastic solutions, accompanying his remarks with a slide depicting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.
War and famine were insufficient for solving global overpopulation, he explained. Instead, disease was far more efficient and swift. At this point, Pianka displayed a slide showing rows of human skulls.
AIDS took too long to kill people off, he explained. His preferred method of exterminating over five billion human beings was via airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and kills its victims in days rather than years.”
I am sure you will agree this makes shocking reading, especially as his speech gained a thunderous roar of applause from the audience.
“I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth’s population by airborne Ebola. …”
“Some even cheered. Dozens then mobbed the professor at the lectern. …”
A few hours later, the Texas Academy of Science presented Pianka with a plaque in recognition of his being named 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.” http://newsweekly.com.au/article.php?id=2439
What Does This Tell Us?
This raises the question as to whether or not it is a coincidence that eight years later, Ebola, a disease that until recently the majority of us had never heard of is suddenly raging through Africa, killing thousands in its wake.
Two days ago the World Health Organization (WHO) reported the following in a situation report:
“A total of 14 098 confirmed, probable, and suspected cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) have been reported in six affected countries (Guinea, Liberia, Mali, Sierra Leone, Spain and the United States of America) and two previously affected countries (Nigeria and Senegal) up to the end of 9 November. There have been 5160 reported deaths.
There is some evidence that case incidence is no longer increasing nationally in Guinea and Liberia, but steep increases persist in Sierra Leone. A mixed picture emerges at the district level. Transmission is consistently high in Conakry and Macenta in Guinea; Montserrado in Liberia; and in the western and northern areas of Sierra Leone. Declines in incidence continue in Lofa in Liberia; and Kenema and Kailahun in Sierra Leone. Cases and deaths continue to be under –
reported in this outbreak.
In Mali, there have been 4 reported confirmed and probable cases, and 4 deaths. The most recent cases are not related to the first EVD – positive patient in Mali , who died on 24 October.
Interventions to contain the disease in the three most affected countries include isolating and treating patients, identifying their contacts and conducting burials in a safe and dignified manner. In the three most affected countries, 19 of 53 planned Ebola Treatment Centres are now open. A total of 140 trained burial teams are on the ground, and more than 4400 burials have reportedly been conducted in a safe and dignified manner since the outbreak began. Samples from all 53 Ebola – affected districts can be sent to a laboratory within 24 hours by road”.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/141468/1/roadmapsitrep_12Nov2014_eng.pdf
Whilst the WHO’s report is a little suspect, as their figures include the words ‘probable’ and ‘suspected’, making it difficult to gauge how many actual cases there have been, surely, we must ask ourselves how a disease causing just a few deaths a year has suddenly became rampant, killing thousands of Africans within weeks?
Is Airborne Ebola an Attempt to Cull the People of Africa?
Could airborne Ebola be yet another attempt to reduce the population in the developing world? This would not be the first time that eugenics have been used to ‘cull’ the population in developing countries as we know that there have been several attempts to make women infertile over the years.
In 1995/1996 tetanus vaccines laced with the HCG hormone were given to all females of childbearing age in the Philippines in an attempt to render them infertile. http://pop.org/content/bad-blood-in-the-philippines-1200
And this tactic was tried for a second time in Kenya, just weeks ago, during what has been called a mass sterilization campaign.http://www.lifenews.com/2014/11/10/mass-sterilization-campaign-un-laces-tetanus-vaccine-with-drug-to-cause-miscarriages/
If these attempts were not bad enough, just days ago it was reported that yet another mass sterilization program went terribly wrong in India, leaving many women injured and dying. According to reports, the program aimed at curbing India’s growing population left nine women dead and twenty fighting for their life.
BBC News stated:
“Villagers say 83 women – all between the ages of 26 and 40 – were operated on in just six hours by one doctor and his assistant.
Reports say the women started complaining of pain and fever, soon after being operated on. A relative described the conditions at the clinic as appalling.
“They just operated on them and left them. It’s a desolate place, there are no facilities there,” DR Shinde told the Associated Press.””http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-29999874
It appears that for many years developing countries have been specifically targeted for mass depopulation programs by our governments. Could the use of airborne Ebola, be the next step in their deliberate attempt to play God and decide who should die and who should live?
How far will these people go in their quest to gain ultimate control?
About the author:
Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.
Christina also has created a world first online resource for parents who have lost their children after vaccine injuries