CSS Offical-New-Logo2

 

Show this video to your children before your child’s school propagandizes them to accept a communitarian form of government as opposed to a Constitutional form of government.  Review all of your child’s homework, especially in social studies and look for signs of indoctrination strategies designed to get your child to believe that they are granted their rights by government.

Under a Constitutional form of government, GOD grants you your liberties (e.g. speech, religion, etc.). Under a communitarian system, the government grants you your rights. And if government can grant rights, they can take them away.

 

By | 2017-10-26T22:08:46+00:00 November 16th, 2014|Conspiracy, Featured, Main, United States|6 Comments

About the Author:

6 Comments

  1. Sophie November 16, 2014 at 6:33 am

    Governments can and do take away rights. That is why it is so important for people to understand what is really going on in government in the U.S. around the world. It is much easier to protect rights and freedoms that are controlled by the citizens of a nation than to get them back, once they are usurped. People growing up in a free, prosperous U. S. have been covertly infiltrated in countless ways and manipulated to think that they can be completely oblivious of the actors who are running the country and what they are doing. Sweeping events over the last decades demonstrate definitively that this is not the case.

    Can you imagine how things would have developed if there had been bugs placed in Bilderberg meetings every year and full transcripts of the plans had been covertly blocked?

    However, unless the citizens of the U.S. can be awakened and organized to effective action –the lesson is correct. Unless the grip upon the U.S. can be thrown off, students really are servants in the emperor’s house and must function accordingly.

    Might may not be right in the opinion of the citizen, but might rules unless it can be countered by some means.

  2. Craig A. Mouldey November 16, 2014 at 7:55 am

    Excellent short video! I wonder how many parents looked over that school exercise and read right over those glaring falsities? And it stands to reason that because the enumerated rights are inherent from God, one does not have to be an Amerikan to possess them. None of it matters because the control freaks, from judges who say ‘I don’t want to hear anything about the constitution in my court’, to police and politicians who act as if such rights were never listed basically are saying to us: Rights? Screw you!

  3. David November 16, 2014 at 11:20 am

    With all due respect I think you have confused the declaration of independence with the constitution. There is nothing in the constitution that remotely indicates that whatever rights you have are granted by God. Not one sentence or phrase. That is the problem. The declaration correctly stated that “…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. This notion was not carried forward in the constitution. And unfortunately the declaration of independence is of no legal value in this country. The courts never refer to the declaration when deciding case law.

    Herein lies the biggest problem with the constitutional republic that rules this country. The negativism of the declaration gave way to positivism when the constitution was ratified. And precisely why this country has been failing ever since. Unless and until people fully understand the difference between negative law and positive law they can never fully grasp the concept of liberty. Negative law (such as the Ten Commandments) tells us what we cannot do while positive law tells us what we must do. This is the difference between freedom and tyranny. Positive law based systems permit government to grow unabated. Laws multiply like rabbits until you have something like the Federal Register which is hundreds of thousands of pages long and the average person commits multiple felonies each day.

    The bill of rights provides limited protections via “civil liberties”. The notion of civil liberties is one of the biggest cons in American history. “Civil rights” are diametrically opposed to liberty. “Civil rights” teaches what its name implies: that our rights descend from the State. “Civil” comes from the Latin civis, meaning “citizen” and therefore under the government’s control. The declaration told us that our freedoms comes from God while the constitution tells us our freedoms come from government. And what the government can give you they most certainly can take away.

    EDITOR’S NOTE: WITH RESPECT, MY RIGHTS COME FROM GOD! I DON’T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT THOSE WHO THINK THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO TELL ME THAT THEY GRANT MY RIGHTS.

  4. NW Native not indentured November 16, 2014 at 11:45 am

    Dave,
    The use or misuse of terms and definitions is important.
    As you correctly wrote human “rights” come from God. These “rights” are enshrined in the Constitution of the Untied States of American and the first ten amendments only.
    (“Of” has been replaced by “for” in most recent preprints of the Constitution).

    The government can only grant “privileges” and not rights.
    To say that the government can grant or give “rights” is to place government on an equal status with God.

    The main purpose of the 14th Amendment, other than “…the public debt…shall not be questioned…” was to make Blacks citizens of the United States…with “privileges ” and “immunities”.
    “Rights” does not appear in the 14th Amendment.
    In simple terms, Blacks were made “citizens” no matter in what state they reside, of the District of Columbia, commonly known as Washington DC, and made wards of the state and under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States congress.

    In other words Blacks were granted the “privileges” of US citizenship commonly known as “civil rights”.

    “Civil rights” are nothing but “privileges” that can granted by government or taken by government. Under the NON lawfully ratified 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th so-called Amendments, the Congress gave itself unlimited powers within the “federal zone” over any person who claims to be a “citizen of the United States, and not a “National Citizen” or an “American Citizen” or a citizen of one of the states United.

    However, one can be considered a citizen of the United States, by saying so in front of a judge, by living or working in the District of Columbia, or the federal territories or living and working on any lands granted to the Federal Government by any state legislature. This is called the Federal Zone under the exclusive jurisdiction of the US Congress. By trickery, fraud or subterfuge any one consenting to 14th Amendment citizenship by receiving any benefits from congress or by filling out any form of paperwork thereby creating by implied contract of adhesion to the jurisdiction of congress. Whew!

    Blacks have exchanged plantation slavery for governmental serfdom and most Whites have joined them.

    Better said Dave, “…Under a communitarian system, the government grants you privileges. And if government can grant privileges, they can take them away.” Corporations have privileges. People have rights. Citizens of the US are treated same has corporations. A fictive creation, or straw man, of the federal government for the benefit of those who hold title of the United States through the public debt.

    The readers of this site may find this information of interest.

    http://topconservativenews.com/2012/03/americas-first-slave-owner-was-a-black-man/

    America’s first slave owner was a black man.

    According to colonial records, the first slave owner in the United States was a black man.

    Prior to 1655 there were no legal slaves in the colonies, only indentured servants. All masters were required to free their servants after their time was up. Seven years was the limit that an indentured servant could be held. Upon their release they were granted 50 acres of land. This included any Negro purchased from slave traders. Negros were also granted 50 acres upon their release.

    Anthony Johnson was a Negro from modern-day Angola. He was brought to the US to work on a tobacco farm in 1619. In 1622 he was almost killed when Powhatan Indians attacked the farm. 52 out of 57 people on the farm perished in the attack. He married a female black servant while working on the farm.

    When Anthony was released he was legally recognized as a “free Negro” and ran a successful farm. In 1651 he held 250 acres and five black indentured servants. In 1654, it was time for Anthony to release John Casor, a black indentured servant. Instead Anthony told Casor he was extending his time. Casor left and became employed by the free white man Robert Parker.

    Anthony Johnson sued Robert Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654. In 1655, the court ruled that Anthony Johnson could hold John Casor indefinitely. The court gave judicial sanction for blacks to own slave of their own race. Thus Casor became the first permanent slave and Johnson the first slave owner.

    Whites still could not legally hold a black servant as an indefinite slave until 1670. In that year, the colonial assembly passed legislation permitting free whites, blacks, and Indians the right to own blacks as slaves.

    By 1699, the number of free blacks prompted fears of a “Negro insurrection.” Virginia Colonial ordered the repatriation of freed blacks back to Africa. Many blacks sold themselves to white masters so they would not have to go to Africa. This was the first effort to gently repatriate free blacks back to Africa. The modern nations of Sierra Leone and Liberia both originated as colonies of repatriated former black slaves.

    However, black slave owners continued to thrive in the United States.

    By 1830 there were 3,775 black families living in the South who owned black slaves. By 1860 there were about 3,000 slaves owned by black households in the city of New Orleans alone.

    Sources:
    John Casor
    Anthony Johnson

  5. ebolamindcontrol November 16, 2014 at 5:32 pm

    When the United States won the Revolutionary War, the Constitution was written to establish a framework for the country to operate and the Bill of Rights to establish your rights as a citizen of the country. If you have any honor, please stay away from kids because they can’t understand all of the little jokes you make regarding topics they can’t comprehend. Sure you make arguments to our rights, but at 8yrs old they’re learning about how this country came to be. Our government does take rights away from people everyday, and they are called felons. They lose their rights in prison, and then lose them again while on parole. They also can’t vote or possess a firearm. So yes, our government does take rights away, and yes it did grant you your basic rights as a citizen of this country. If you want to talk about your God given rights, go ahead, but as a citizen of this country, you are given rights based on your citizenship of said country. If you break the rules and become a felon or treason, then you lose rights. If you are guilty of treason, then you lose your right to life in accordance with American Laws.

  6. NW Native not a serf November 16, 2014 at 11:49 pm

    ebolamindcontrol has some interesting take on what the United States of America was originally all about.
    Sad to say mind control’s commentary does reflect how this one time nation of free and independent states (nations) has been transformed into a dictatorial play toy of international elites to which the US congress is in thrall. I hope you enjoy your servitude.

    Mind control wrote:
    “When the United States won the Revolutionary War, the Constitution was written to establish a framework for the country to operate and the Bill of Rights to establish your rights as a citizen of the country.” (Wrong. All God given human rights preexisted any and all government. As Tom Jefferson said the Constitution is the chain to tie down government so that the people could enjoy their “unalienable” liberties, rights and freedoms and not happiness but “the Pursuit of Happiness–That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, driving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…”
    Note, inalienable is often used in place of “unalienable”. Un-a-lien-able. Simply put, no lien can be placed upon the liberties and rights of the people.

    “If you have any honor, please stay away from kids because they can’t understand all of the little jokes you make regarding topics they can’t comprehend. Sure you make arguments to our rights, but at 8yrs old they’re learning about how this country came to be.” Our government does take rights away from people everyday, and they are called felons. They lose their rights in prison, and then lose them again while on parole. They also can’t vote or possess a firearm. So yes, our government does take rights away, and yes it did grant you your basic rights as a citizen of this country. If you want to talk about your God given rights, go ahead, but as a citizen of this country, you are given rights based on your citizenship of said country. If you break the rules and become a felon or treason, then you lose rights. If you are guilty of treason, then you lose your right to life in accordance with American Laws.
    (The remainder of this is typical of the thinking of most people. It is with this kind of thinking that the US has the largest prison population in the world. No other country even comes close. Many of those in prison were “convicted” of victimless crimes, or paper crimes, not in the lexicon of common law crimes. So-called imprisoned persons doesn’t lose the God given rights. They are simply in no a position to exercise their rights.

    To be more colorful, government can’t give you “jack-shit”.
    Government can’t take from you what it has no power to give.
    And what it does take it does so by force. And there are those who willingly submit to tyranny, thinking government will make them safe and what they will end up is the Orwellian boot standing and grinding on their face forever.

Comments are closed.