CSS Offical-New-Logo2

 

 

The parents of Kayla Mueller, the Arizona woman who was taken hostage by ISIS in August, 2013, confirmed Tuesday their daughter died while in the hands of the terror group.

“We are heartbroken to share that we’ve received confirmation that Kayla Jean Mueller, has lost her life,” Carl and Marsha Mueller, of Prescott, Ariz., said in a statement. “Kayla was a compassionate and devoted humanitarian. She dedicated the whole of her young life to helping those in need of freedom, justice, and peace… Kayla, in a 2011 letter to her father stated that some people see God in the Bible or in Church, Kayla found God in helping to alleviate suffering”

The family received information from their daughter’s ISIS captors over the weekend that was authenticated, according to U.S. officials.

“The family received a private message from Kayla’s ISIL captors containing additional information,” National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said Tuesday. “Once this information was authenticated by the intelligence community, they concluded that Kayla was deceased.”

It is not yet known how or when 26-year-old Mueller died. ISIS claimed last week she was killed by a Jordanian airstrike, but offered no immediate evidence.

President Obama issued a statement Tuesday, also acknowledging her death (Good Morning Arizona, Channel 3 News, Phoenix, AZ. 2/10/2015.)

Kayla’s death is the kind of tragedy that can easily inflame a nation’s passion to go to war. Subsequently, President Obama wasted no time asking Congress for a declaration of war and Kayla’s tragic death is the impetus behind this move.

Like most American citizens, we are all outraged at Kayla’s death and we want revenge against the animals that did this. As justified as these feelings are, Kayla’s death may end up being the provocation for World War III.

 

Obama Is Still Under Immense Pressure

Obama is under enormous pressure, from the Federal Reserve Banksters to take out the Iranian regime. The need to take down Iran is necessitated because the Petrodollar is in real trouble because of Iran’s insistence on selling oil to countries such as India, China and Russia in exchange for gold.

Gold is a four letter word to the Banksters. The Banksters must maintain their fiat currency schemes. Subsequently, the Banksters must dominate the purchase of oil and the distribution of gold for three reasons:

(1) The Banksters thrive on fiat currency which is backed by virtually nothing and this is coupled with fractional reserve practices in order to acquire real material wealth based on their creation of worthless paper and the introduction of gold threatens this Ponzi scheme;

This is what happens to those who say no to the central banking cartel.

(2) Since Breton Woods, the world has been forced by the Banksters to play in their Ponzi scheme game by first purchasing Federal Reserve dollars which is in turn used to purchase oil. Saddam Hussein failed to play by the Petrodollar rules by selling oil for Euros and paid for his disobedience with his life; and,

(3) Once the Banksters collapse the currencies of the world, they want to be the ones controlling gold, the only remaining currency, in a post economic Armageddon.

To accomplish these goals, Iran must go. And before Iran can be conquered, Syria must be taken down.

Why Does Syria Have to Be Occupied Before Attacking Iran?

Putin threatened to nuke the United States if it invaded Syria in violation of international law. Syria is critical to the Russians on a number of fronts. However, the most compelling reason for Putin to defend Syria is because if the U.S. is able to successfully occupy Syria, the U.S. will be able to install their short and medium range missile batteries which would prevent the Russians from moving into Syria, thus preventing an American ground invasion of Iran. Once Syria is occupied by the U.S. it is just a matter of time until the U.S., can find a reason to invade Iran. Once Iran is conquered, the Petrodollar is preserved, at least for the time being. Invading Syria has been Obama’s top foreign policy goal since 2013.  Obama is now on his second Reichstag moment with regard to putting boots on the ground in Syria.

Obama’s First Reichstag Moment

 
All historians are familiar with how Hitler was able to seize and consolidate power within the German Reichstag. He simply had his henchmen burn the German legislative building to the ground and then blame the Communists, one of the Nazi’s chief rivals. Subsequently, Hitler assumed total dictatorial power, as a pretense to protect the German people, and he was able to eliminate the Communists and the rest, as they say, was history.

President Obama previously tried to invoke his “Reichstag” pretext for war with Syria as Obama had accused Syrian leader, Assad, of using chemical weapons against the rebels in 2013, despite the fact that it appears likely that the al-Qaeda run rebels were the ones using chemical weapons. Obama was unable to get Congress or the American people to believe that this chemical attack was a justified reason to go to war, and in the fall of 2013, Obama failed to get the war with Syria that he desired.

Obama’s Second Reichstag Moment

Ask the average American, “Who is ISIS?”, they will pause and give you a blank stare. ISIS came from nowhere. It is well armed and acts like a well-trained army.  Abracadabra, poof, ISIS appears at the very time we pull out of Iraq. This is no coincidence. What we now know is that the U.S. military left behind key combat equipment in Iraq. By law, the U.S. military was to destroy these weapons upon vacating a war zone. Why wasn’t this done? Someone had to give the order to not destroy the equipment. And just who comprises ISIS? We are now told that it is a conglomeration of terrorist interests ranging from al Qaeda to Hamas to the Muslim Brotherhood. And this loose confederation of terrorists is armed to the teeth in the latest in American military technology. Even the most ardent supporter of the Obama administration would have to suspect that ISIS is a CIA creation and that is exactly what my military sources have been telling me.

The goal for ISIS is to spread terror and havoc across Iraq and have this spread into Syria. I wrote in 2013, that there will be a provoking event which will invite American military intervention into Syria against ISIS as an excuse to remove Assad and occupy Syria. Kayla Jean Mueller’s death has provided that provocation.  Kayla’s noble character and devotion to humanity makes her an ideal martyr for Obama to be doing what he is doing which is commence a “three year ground war” against ISIS.

My military sources are laughing in amazement that anyone would believe that it would take the full force of the U.S. military three years to take down ISIS. What a joke! Because of air superiority, our military could eliminate ISIS as an effective battlefield force in three days, not three years! However, what ISIS does provide is an impetus to put boots on the ground in Syria. The following is a map of ISIS territorial gains.

Please note that this map is 9 months old, but is still mostly accurate as ISIS has been occuped with solidifying their acquistoins. But also note that ISIS is poised to attack Damascus.

What is even more noteworthy is that ISIS now controls much of Iraqi oil. This permits ISIS to buy weapons on the international market as a result of this control.

 

 

 

Where did such an upstart terrorist group gain this kind of financial and military sophistication?  The short and only answer is through the CIA. ISIS was created to put American boots on the ground in Syria in order to block Russian intervention for an invasion of Iran.  This is a Petrodollar war.

Conclusion

I want revenge for the death of Kayla. Most Americans want to extract vengeance. However, Kayla would not want to see what is about to happen in Syria take place because of her tragic death.  Also, the three year authorization for war against ISIS is an excuse to prolong the threat.

May Kayla rest in peace and may we honor what I would believe would be her desire to see peace, not World War III.

When American troops enter Syria against this fabricated enemy, how will Putin respond? Will there be domestic ramifications? These are the topics of the next article in this series.