CSS Offical-New-Logo2

anti-obama

In the world of an “Et tu Brute” coup against the established political leadership, there are two separate and distinct kinds of coup. First, there is the coup of opportunity. The coup of opportunity occurs, as luck would have it, when circumstances present an opportunity for the military force a change in leadership. the second kind of coup involves a general discontent among military leadership along with allies within the government and this kind of coup almost always has the backing of the majority of the citizenry.

A Coup of Opportunity

clinton and stevensA distinct coup of opportunity took place during the establishment’s “stand down” position while Ambassador Stevens and his security fought for their lives at Benghazi. The attack on Benghazi took place at a time when Obama was changing military commanders faster than most people change their socks. Under Obama, nobody in the military could have felt secure in their positions. The military had come to see how they had been sold out by Obama and American military lives were at risk. For that matter, the entire country was at risk under Obama’s leadership.

As a prelude to the attack on Benghazi, Stevens had been trafficking in guns, drugs and children on behalf of the CIA for the express purpose of raising funds, Iran-Contra style, for Middle East Terrorist groups. These facts were leaking out and 2012, was an election year and the leak had to be plugged. Stevens knew he was in danger as his requests for a stronger body guard contingent went ignored by his boss at the time, Hillary Clinton. I subsequently learned that Stevens reached out to the military command structure in the area and asked for help in the event he was attacked. The traditional American military was all too happy to help because Stevens could have brought down the Obama administration in a post-rescue scenario as he would have sung like a canary as to the kinds of criminal activities that the administration was engaged in.

The two military who were going to rescue Stevens and change the course of military history were AFRICOM’s commanding officer, General Carter Ham, and Carrier task force commander, Admiral Charles M. Gayouette.

The positions held by Hamm and Gayouette are so powerful and so sensitive, their replacements requireed approval from the Senate.

Both leaders were jointly attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens and his bodyguards, despite being told to stand down by Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta. There is now  proof that Obama was warned in advance of the coming attack in which Stevens begged for more protection and his impassioned plea was denied by Clinton.

As Stevens was begging for help after the attack had begun, General Hamm had activated a special forces team within minutes of learning that the embassy, which was really a CIA safe house, was under attack. When General Ham received his “stand down” orders from Obama, he made plans to go ahead with the rescue and was arrested within minutes of contravening he order by his second in command, General Rodriquez, of the CIA. Admiral Gayouette, the commander of Carrier Strike Group Three, was preparing to provide intelligence and air cover for General Hamm’s rescue team in violation of his standing orders and he was promptly relieved of command for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment.” 

General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders.

It is abundantly clear that had Obama been concerned for saving the lives of the four murdered Americans, American forces could have stopped the mortar fire that eventually killed Ambassador Stevens. However, Panetta and Obama blocked any rescue attempt. In legal parlance, Obama, Panetta and Clinton were, at minimum, accomplices to murder.

I was given this information in September of 2012 and told to publish these accounts. I hesitated for a couple of weeks because I did not feel that I had enough supporting information. I was repeatedly told to throw caution to the wind and publish this story. I was further told that I would be vindicated when the inevitable Congressional investigation would take place. This, indeed, ended up being the case.

As I look back on the Benghazi days, it is clear that even though the coup failed to produce its final and desired result, a message had been sent to and among key military leaders that there was a military contingent that was not going to capitulate to the illegal alien occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Boulevard.

The Benghazi affair was a failed coup of opportunity.

A Planned Military Coup

seven days in mayA planned coup, as opposed to a coup of opportunity, requires elaborate and secret planning. The element of surprise is essential in this type of coup. The 1960’s movie, The Seven Days in May, starring Burt Lancaster and Kirk Douglas captured many of these elements.

The one essential element that was missing from the aforementioned movie was that every successful coup of this type requires the eventual support of the people. The coup of opportunity at Benghazi required no such public approval. The scandal, as revealed by Stevens, would have produced the desired political change.

In the aftermath of Benghazi, and out of ignorance, I asked my insider source if there was going to be a coup anytime soon, as I lamented how close the country came to ridding itself of its biggest threat. I was told in unequivocal terms, that the dumbed down status of the American prevented any such planned coup from transpiring and that another coup of opportunity would have to present itself before there could be another attempt.

Another Coup of Opportunity

From both the circumstantial evidence and recent events, there may very well be another a coup of opportunity.

It is being widely reported that U.S. General Joseph Dunford ordered the President to steer clear of Scalia’s funeral following a conversation that Dunford had with Russian Colonel General Bondarev in which he was asked why Obama had attended a secret meeting with Scalia shortly before his death and had wondered out loud why Scalia did not have an autopsy. This information has been widely circulated and surprisingly, it is not getting the traction that it should be getting.

Scalia, as the leader of the conservative element of the Supreme Court, was Obama’s biggest obstacle with regard to Obama fulfilling his prime directive as President, namely, to install a rigid cap and trade system which would permanently destroy the economic backbone of the country. It has also been determined that Scalia had a secret meeting, that has leaked out with Obama shortly before his death but after the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, struck down Obama’s key Climate Change initiatives. I am not privy to what Obama told Scalia, but I think it is safe to say they were not booking tee times on the golf course.

The feud between Obama and Scalia led to the following statements made by Scalia about the possibility of Obama taking retribution against Scalia. In 2012, in Fox news interview, Scalia publicly refuted the notion that Obama would retaliate against him for his rulings which ran in the face of the Obama administration.

 

 

This was a very telling interview and one can see how Scalia totally underestimated Obama’s potential for retribution. Add to these facts, the information that Scalia was was found with a pillow case on his face is mind-boggling. This was a message killing. However, as I have been told, the message to all is that nobody is safe from the despot-in-chief and subsequently, some feel they have little to lose with regard to acting against this President.

A Constitutional Crisis Could Force Obama Out Of White House

In the recent interview with Trunews, retired U.S. Air Force Lt. General Thomas McInerney and Retired U.S. Army General Paul Vallely talked seriously about the possibility of a “Constitutional crisis” that could occur at the hands of President Barack Obama. This was the proverbial “pillow case” over Obama’s face. It is not a physical threat, but it certainly is a political threat. “According to the report General Dunford lashed out at Bondarev claiming “of course the bastard [Obama] murdered him“.

 

Conclusion

My source has told me that Obama will not take the fall for the assassination of Scalia as he was too well insulated.  However, as Commander-In-Chief, Obama has a fiduciary duty to protect the American people from foreign and domestic enemies. The failure to do could result in a potential reality if Obama refuses to protect the American people from the threat of ISIS and other known terror groups. To date, Obama has refused to even acknowledge Muslim extremism as a threat. And Obama has appointed several members to his administration who have active ties to the terrorist group known as the Muslim Brotherhood. This cannot be setting well with the military as we have troops fighting and dying in Afghanistan against these same types of people.

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that Obama does not have a contingency plan, he does. The multitude of foreign troops on our soil is a presidential insurance policy. Further, UWEX 16, the ongoing civil was drill going on in Texas speaks to what Obama is expecting to come his way.

Donate to The Common Sense Show