/, Featured, Main/The New 5G Network Is Deadly
The New 5G Network Is Deadly

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

 

5g

5g2The LA Times is one of the mouthpieces of the globalists that we like to refer to as the New World Order. And when this puppet newspaper writes about the potential dangers associated with the threat posed by major corporations, we should all sit up and take notice.

Recently, the LA Times, through both overt and covert means revealed the dangers of the new 5G network to human health and safety.

Although the LA Times tip-toes around the issued of the extreme dangers associated with the new 5G network, these excerpts from the LA Times on the lethal dangers of this new network, clearly show the dangers:

Is 5G technology dangerous? Early data shows a slight increase of tumors in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation

… wireless companies prepare to launch the next generation of service, there are new questions about the possible health risks from radiation emitted by cellphones and the transmitters that carry the signals…

“…the launch of super-fast 5G technology over the next several years will dramatically increase the number of transmitters sending signals to cellphones and a host of new Internet-enabled devices, including smart appliances and autonomous vehicles. And the move to the new technology comes after unsettling findings from a long-awaited federal government study of the cancer risk from cellphone use.”

“National Toxicology Program researchers released preliminary data in May that showed small increases in tumors in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation…”(Editor’s Note: If you are the one who gets the cancerous tumors in your body, does that constitute a small risk?).

“The rats were exposed to nine hours of radiation daily, in 10-minutes-on, 10-minutes-off intervals, over their whole bodies for two years. The researchers found increased incidences of rare brain and heart tumors starting at about the federally allowable level of cellphone radiation for brain exposure, with greater incidences at about two and four times those levels.”(Editor’s Note: Under the 5G network installation plan, the human “rats” will be exposed, not for 9 hours, but we will all be exposed for 24/7/365. And if the effects are cumulative, as researchers like Virginia Farver believe to be true, the cancer risk rises exponentially. Even if we take the statistics at face value for the aforementioned study, why would anyone knowingly expose themselves to a variable that increases cancer risk by 200-400%?).

“…the American Cancer Society said marked “a paradigm shift in our understanding of radiation and cancer risk,” reignited debate about the potential harmful effects of cellphones on human health…”(Editor’s note: In a manner similar to how we inform the public about the inherent risk of cigarettes, which includes a warning label prominently displayed on the container housing the product, shouldn’t we require the same for something that increases our cancer risk by 200-400% and has captured the attention of the American Cancer Society? Has “informed consent” taken a backseat with regard to the cell phone industry and its army of congressional lobbyists?).

Last month, the U.S. became the first nation to allocate a large swath of airwaves for 5G. Those services could be available to consumers by 2020, offering transmission speeds at least 10 times faster than today’s 4G.

“The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously to allow wireless providers access to high-frequency airwaves that have had limited uses because they can’t carry data very far.”(Editor’s note: Can’t carry data “VERY FAR”? What kind of pseudoscience and illogical reasoning is this with regard to justifying the use of a product with an unproven safety record? Please be mindful that the FCC granted their permission for this highly questionable process without looking at, or conducting, even one scientific study. The public safety be damned. Again, deferring to the research of Virginia Farver, as she states, “that the regulatory agencies that are supposed to protect the public from the excesses of this industry, are bought and paid for as are the city councils who are givengrants to encourage the sell-0ut of their citizens).

Technological advances have made it possible to expand consumer wireless services into those airwaves. But to use the spectrum, wireless companies will have to install thousands of small base stations — some just the size of smoke detectors — on utility poles and buildings to pass the signals along.(Editor’s Note: This LA Times reporter make this whole process sound so innocuous and harmless as he minimizes the threat be referring to the small size of the devices needed to pass along the signal. In a recent interview, I conducted with noted researcher, Virginia Farver, she stated that the city councils of Broomfield and Ft. Collins, Colorado, have approved the installation of these devices every quarter mile in densely populated areas. With this kind of market penetration, every citizen within these localities will be exposed to this radiation, that increases cancer risk by 200-400%, on a 24/7/365 basis. For these people and soon the rest of us, there will nowhere to run and nowhere to hide from this omnipresent danger). 

“There were about 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings at the end of last year, double the number there were in 2002, according to CTIA, a leading wireless trade group.”

“It’s unclear how many smaller base stations would be needed for 5G service. But it’s widely believed that there would need to be exponentially more because of the limited distance the signals can travel. One researcher estimated a station would be needed for every 12 homes in a dense urban area. (Editor’s Note: This is the Broomfield, CO., city council’s notion of community suicide, a 5G tower every quarter mile (12 homes in a densely populated neighborhood). There are other research considerations that are going unanswered. How does this technology impact pregnant women and their unborn babies? What impact will the 5G network have on the plasticity of young people’s developing brains? How does this impact the circadian rhythms of sleep?).

“There is a big concern with the previous technology and it’s just being made worse with 5G,” said Kevin Mottus, outreach director for the California Brain Tumor Assn., who attend the FCC meeting and unsuccessfully attempted to ask officials about the health effects.” (Editor’s Note: In Broomfield and Ft. Collins, public comment is not allowed).

“These are microwave transmitters and the closer you are to them, the more problems,” he said. 

“Desiree Jaworski, executive director of the Center for Safer Wireless, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the potential hazards of wireless radiation, said 5G signals will be harder for people to avoid.”

“Right now, you don’t have to live next to a cell tower. If you’re concerned about it, you can move away,” she said. “But once they have these cell antennas everywhere, you won’t be able to do that.”

Why Is This Dangerous Technology Being Forced Upon America?

In my radio interview with Virginia Farver, we explored this question. We both agree, that there are two components to underlying motivations associated with the use of such a dangerous product.

  1. greed is goodThis is corporate America, using governmental power which allows them to imperil public safety at the expense of corporate profits. The communications industry spends hundreds of millions in order to buy Congress and the White House. “Greed is good”.
  2. ted_turnerThe other obvious reason for the employment of something so obviously dangerous and lethal speaks to the fact that this is a depopulation scheme.

I asked Farver which of the two beliefs she subscribed to. We both agree that both agendas are in play at the same time. Clearly, stockholders are going to be happy with each quarterly report because of the extreme market penetration. However, the real power behind the scenes, the Ted Turner’s, the David Rockefeller’s, and the George Soros’, will profit from humanity’s demise.

Behavior Modification

 It would be necessary to manage the behaviors of the human lab rats if they were to have any thought of rebelling against their planned demise. Therefore, there is a third simultaneous agenda and that has to do with behavior modification. If one can manipulate behavior through electromagnetic signals, the population can be made to be docile and willing march towards their demise with uttering a word in protest.

I have previously written very detailed articles on the behavior modification techniques developed by such pioneers as Jose Delgado. Further, Nick Begich has covered these electronically controlled behavioral modification devices (i.e. voice to skull technology and Project HAARP). If one doubts the veracity of the claims made here in this article, I would strongly encourage reviewing the work of Delgado and Begich. And even a more detailed report on the technology can be found here.

Conclusion

I strongly encourage the reader to listen to my recent interview with Virginia Farver. This interview is chilling in its effect, but summarizes with more detail than is presented here.

The stark reality is this, if people, in overwhelming numbers do not speak up now, it will soon be too late to stop this assault upon humanity.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL AND DON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

 

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer. Don't wait until it is too late. CLICK HERE for more information

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.   Don’t wait until it is too late.  Click Here for more information.


This Movie Reveals the Greatest Threats to the American People

 Charlie (Gary Heavin) and Brandon (Spencer Neville) team up to fight government overreach and protect their Constitutional rights in Forewarned LLC's new movie, AMERIGEDDON (2016).

The blockbuster movie, Amerigeddon, to be released. Click here for a list of theaters


From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. Take 5% off the cost of your order with coupon code DAVE5

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com.  FOR COMMON SENSE SHOW LISTENERS, YOU CAN GET FIVE PERCENT OFF YOUR NEXT ORDER BY USING THE COUPON CODE “DAVE5”

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT MORE    


If the bad guy has night vision and you don't he wins. Don't be a victim, find out more by CLICKING HERE

If the bad guy has night vision and you don’t he wins. Don’t be a victim, find out more by  CLICKING HERE  

______________________________

The sane alternative to Facebook

unseen

Seen.Life-The Facebook alternative- no censorship, no spying–

Sign up here

By | 2017-10-26T22:00:45+00:00 August 9th, 2016|Conspiracy, Featured, Main|14 Comments

About the Author:

14 Comments

  1. laura m. August 9, 2016 at 6:50 am

    I have an older flip phone Republic Wireless prepaid had for long time (rarely used), we have a land line also. Have no interest in texting, just emails and phone messages left on recorders. What should people do to avoid the 5G? For health safety, should they stick to landlines and flip phones which are still sold? Will flip phones or older smart phones be at risk being used? Or are these phone signals all over the place from cell towers.

  2. […] Source: The New 5G Network Is Deadly – Dave Hodges – The Common Sense Show […]

  3. DM August 9, 2016 at 8:12 am

    It is possible to buy microwave protection material that you can line clothing with. I use ir extensively and find it quite useful and effective as I am EMF sensitive.

    You can encourage people to use powerline wired networks that remove the need of wireless in the home. You can turn off the wifi in your router and buy a protective phone pouch to control your phone radiation. You can buy a microwave meter/detector.

    Lifi signals use light instead of microwaves and is an alternative to wifi though it is not being promoted at all.

    You can get microwave protection paint to paint your home. Many government buildings have protection materials built in. You can use these materials in your own home.

    You could move to a very rural location or a country with enforced maximum microwave levels.

  4. juridicus August 9, 2016 at 8:31 am

    Because of the Federal Communications Act, local municipalities are essentially powerless to stop this. Provided that cell providers signals are within the levels approved by the Act it is impermissible to challenge the installation of towers based upon the transmission of signals within the statute’s guidelines.

  5. moonlitemike August 9, 2016 at 8:36 am

    Thing is, they are not doing this because they want to give us better service, its to better the function of their control grid, any toxic side effect is just a bonus.

    Makes me think of the big push to digital signals for TV, it wasn’t.to give better service, as broadcast distance was greatly reduced, and weather effects the digital signals more causingn even close stations to glitch out. In my area before digital I picked up stations 150 miles away, with digital its like 30 miles tops.

    Makes you wonder what they are doing with the analog airwaves.

  6. Thoughts not your own August 9, 2016 at 9:30 am

    Anyone seen the movie trailer for the “Cell” movie?

  7. Ben August 9, 2016 at 12:06 pm

    One thing that was left out are the tracking capabilities. Right now 4g towers are about 2 miles a part so triangulating someone’s location will get you to a general area. With these 5g repeaters every 1/4 mile the resolution will much higher due to many more repeaters being available to triangulate your position. GPS will drop out many times when you’re indoors but these will still work and your precise location in a building will now be available.

  8. Avago August 9, 2016 at 2:09 pm

    Wifi in general is bad for you if you are around it day in day out, i recently replaced our wifi modem and was surprised to find that it was making the subwoofer near it give off a midrange pulsating buzzing sound that is very annoying. It is a 2x wifi modem so twice as powerful as normal wifi.. Needless to say i turn off the subwoofer when not being used and the modem goes off at night. so i can just imagine how strong 5G will be.

  9. Piper Michael August 9, 2016 at 3:35 pm

    Would you set up house keeping in a microwave oven?
    Same concept.

  10. philip August 9, 2016 at 6:19 pm

    Type in BLAME IT ON CAPTAIN KIRK and then do the math. Interesting.

  11. Mike August 9, 2016 at 6:59 pm

    For anyone who understands Cell phone technology they know that the RF power coming from the antennas on the cell towers is a really weak signal. We are talking less than 20 watts!! That is the whole idea behind cell phones. Lots of tall towers in close proximity transmitting at VERY low power levels. To put this into perspective that radio station tower in your city or town is pumping out up to 50,000 watts of power and yet nobody is worried about that but they are petrified about the tiny amount of power transmitted by cell towers???? Cell towers with their large antennas look like they are transmitting huge amounts of power but as I stated already they are not. Those large antennas are used for higher gain or in otherwords to try to take advantage of the weak signals being generated or received. 5G has more to do with more powerful computing and capacity technology than anything to do with more rf radiation.

  12. Gary Yates August 9, 2016 at 8:03 pm

    I am reminded of a science fiction story written by Robert Heinlein in 1940 called “Waldo”, in which electric power is being broadcast wirelessly like Tesla wanted to do. In this story there is a man who knows this is harmfull, and so his house is shielded by lead and he wears a lead-lined overcoat whenever he must venture out. For what it’s worth, my house has a hip roof with aluminum shingles and cell phone and radio reception are very weak indoors. But, there’s a smart meter, so I’m screwed anyway.

Comments are closed.