Trump Needs to Ban All Immigration for 90 Days- Travel Ban Struck Down Again

CSS-Offical-New-Logo2

 

Trump has been blocked the vetting process for immigration, again by an activist judge. We have totally open borders!

Trump’s executive order was struck down because it was labeled as anti-Muslim.

If Trump is going to secure the borders, he only has one chance, one opportunity. Here’s the plan:

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL ANDDON’T FORGET TO “LIKE” US

 

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer. Don't wait until it is too late. CLICK HERE for more information

This is the absolute best in food storage. Dave Hodges is a satisfied customer.  Listeners to The Common Sense Show will receive 5% off their next order by mentioning “Hodgesnov5” in the coupon code box.  Don’t wait until it is too late. Click Here  for more information.

 

By |March 16th, 2017|Featured, Immigration, Main|15 Comments

About the Author:

15 Comments

  1. Global Grist March 16, 2017 at 7:59 pm

    An illegal pronouncement by a judge asserting Constitutional rights for foreigners. Makes sense in the “destroy America at all cost” atmosphere created and promoted by loony liberal globalist sympathizers.
    Just because a judge blows wind without any legal precedent does not mean the world has to bow to the edict of a radical bent on ruining our country under the false guise of protecting the rights of non-citizens to the detriment of legal citizens.
    This “judge” is seditious. The historical law and legal precedence supports Trump’s executive order. If this IDIOT judge’s order is validated, our Constitution has become completely worthless in protecting American citizens.

  2. Global Grist March 16, 2017 at 8:17 pm

    What you are seeing is the de facto Obama presidency being continued under Trump. Obama’s crony loony liberal globalist oriented anti-American judges are keeping the Obama regime and their edicts in power. Obama is gone. The country elected Trump to reverse much of what the previous administration did to ruin this country. Now we have to endure the subversives that have been stacked in roles of judgment to continue our nation’s destruction. The problem is about half the people in this country are OK with it. And the more immigrants (especially illegal) that we bring here dilute our heritage even more. We have the Executive and the Legislative power, it’s high time they told these seditious judges to go pound sand and do what is necessary to protect our country from further destruction.

  3. DHB March 16, 2017 at 9:20 pm

    So you want to Have Trump declare marshal law?

    The system is working but we have idiots running the system.

    If Trump does what you say, Congress will impeach Trump for violating a court injunction.

  4. Rob March 17, 2017 at 2:03 am

    What good are executive orders if a judge can override them? This is crap. So did we not have to go along with the obama eo’s? Since when does a judge trump the president? Or did i miss something?

  5. Mollypitcher March 17, 2017 at 3:07 am

    If CONgress ever impeached DJT over something like this. Civil war.

  6. Ace Anderson March 17, 2017 at 5:24 am

    This is a perfectly logical course of action against federal judges abusive contempt of the law. I would say a moratorium for an indefinite period of time. Furthermore in the meantime these 2 cases will have to be brought before supreme court AFTER n. Gorsuch is approved the winning decision can reinforce the moratorium by re-affirming the president’s right to dictate immigration

  7. Ballsy billie March 17, 2017 at 5:31 am

    As far as refugees coming into the country go. I would utilize the FEMA camps to safely utilize the time consuming vetting. This would save the nation money as far as housing and other goodies that they receive. When their country is determined to be free of strife and war then return them there.

  8. Clem O'Leary March 17, 2017 at 10:41 am

    The Republican have a numrricsl advantage in the house. It is highly unlikely they would impeach him over such a horrendous ruling. DHB must be a communist snowflak or hillary shill.

  9. Clem O'Leary March 17, 2017 at 10:48 am

    The Republican have a numbers advantage in the house. It is highly unlikely they would impeach him over such a horrendous ruling. DHB must be a communist snowflak or hillary shill.

  10. Global Grist March 17, 2017 at 7:26 pm

    Who said anything about marshal law?
    If the legislature would stand with Trump and support him then maybe some rationality can be achieved.
    What these activist judges are doing is usurping authority to dictate on immigration using phony arguments
    formulated from whole cloth. Authority that is not theirs.
    The majority of Americans back Trump’s immigration measures. The wishy-washy Congress needs to
    stiffen up to ensure the laws we have are followed and not circumvented by activist judges that have an
    agenda to ruin America.

  11. D March 17, 2017 at 8:32 pm

    Trump needs to mention how Catholic Europeans for aboiit six hundred years fought the Muslim Moores and Turks and had the Crusades to retrieve the Holy land from the Muslims. Many Europeans died at the hands of the Moores and Turks Trump needs to teach us how Pope Pius ” army saved Rome from being invaded by the Turks and how Spain and Portugal fought off the Moores. How the Turks killed off thousands of Armenians in the late 1800’s. Europe and the USA and even I need to learn more about the Muslim Moores and Turkish Muslim history. It is played down because the Catholic Church was greatly affected and many Catholic countries were physically and financially exhausted. Trump would be wise to mention the Islamic violent ways of the past. Six hundred years of violent history has almost been forgotten.

  12. Rose March 19, 2017 at 4:42 pm

    Please bear with me for a few moments while I take you back three years. Our country was embroiled in the huge scandal involving Obama’s forged birth certificate before December 11, 2013, when Loretta Fuddy was still alive (before she was murdered in Hawaiian waters). An independent news source revealed that a female government official (if memory serves, possibly from the State Department) actually hopped on a plane to make a “special delivery” of one little document and paid a personal visit to an individual in the government of Hawaii involved in the forging of the birth certificate. Note that this woman official did not mail, fax, or email this little document to the recipient in Hawaii. As I recall, the purpose of this very special and secret visit was to deliver heaven knows how much cash to the recipient who was in on the dirty deal to forge Obama’s birth certificate. So, this U.S. government official personally flew to Hawaii (loaded with cash with which to bribe the individual in Hawaii who helped forge Obama’s birth certificate). Can we then follow the cash?

    Well, when criminals transport cash, it’s much more difficult for detectives and researchers to follow the money trail, isn’t it?

    On March 18, 2017, in a fashion similar to what the above-mentioned female government operative flew to Hawaii, Obama hopped on a plane and paid a visit to Honolulu less than 48 hours before the U.S. District (Federal ) Judge Derrick Watson blocked Trump’s new (revised) travel ban nationwide. Do you believe in coincidences? Someone who brings a spitload of cash is articulate, eloquent and influential beyond description. Charming!

  13. Rose March 20, 2017 at 10:00 am

    “ … Obama’s personal attorney, Judith Corley of Perkins Coie, reportedly flew to Honolulu to “act on [the White House counsel’s] his behalf” to PAY FOR and obtain two certified copies of the document allegedly on file at the department.” (source: The New York Times Claims Obama Attorney Sent to Hawaii to “Find” Long-Form Birth Certificate, posted on 8-28-16. Emphasis mine)

    Doesn’t it seem odd to you that Judith Corley flew to Honolulu just to obtain two birth certificate copies? Couldn’t she simply order the copies Federal Expressed to her? Isn’t it rather obvious that in order to bribe someone in secrecy, one must bring cash?

    Do you believe that Judith Corley paid “ten dollars for the first copy and four dollars for the second” copy of Obama’s birth certificate? (Source article: President Obama’s Birth Certificate Delivers News To Doctor’s Family, http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/…/president-obamas-birth-certificate-delivers-news-to-doct...)

    If that were true, then how come Loretta Fuddy had $50,000 to $75,000 that her salary didn’t pay? (Source article: By Doug Hagmann, 1-13-2014, What Are the Chances, The Mysterious Death of Loretta Fuddy)

    Barack Obama has many talents. Self-admittedly, he is “good at killing people.” Since he is so good at killing people, do you think Obama would hesitate to “influence” people for his personal gain? It certainly pays to be influenced by Obama. You can pay off your credit cards and make a down payment on a fancy condo. But whether one can keep one’s head after saying ‘Yes’ to Obama, that’s a whole different matter. Dead Loretta certainly told no tales.

  14. marie joy March 20, 2017 at 5:25 pm

    Ban ALL immigration until ALL can be, properly, vetted.

Comments are closed.