/, Main, Martial Law/SCOTUS Affirms the Right for Permanent Detention With No Due Process! And You Thought FEMA Camps Were Not Real
SCOTUS Affirms the Right for Permanent Detention With No Due Process! And You Thought FEMA Camps Were Not Real

Camp Grayling, a known FEMA camp, was the site of massive training for the Michigan Army Reservists and the Michigan National Guard. They say they were training for GITMO duty during the Jade Helm 15 and 16 era. Anyone doubting the veracity of this claim should check their search engine for  “FM 3-39.4” and make sure you are seated as you read this Army Field Manual. Jade Helm 15 and 16 was the rehearsal for the unconstitutional mass detention in times of martial law without due process. And now that process has been affirmed by the Supreme Court.

 The Government Is Giving Itself the Option to Imprison Americans Without Due Process

In the post-Jade Helm era, and just over five months ago, it was reported that Camp Grayling was now the site where robots are being trained to fire 50 caliber machine guns. This means that FEMA camps, at least in part, will be manned by robots!

This should be concerning to everyone, because it is clear that government is modernizing its FEMA camp facility with a specific purpose in mind.

This story is not just another FEMA camp analysis. This story is about the government giving itself the option of incarcerating American for any reason, or no reason, simply based on the “say-so” of those in charge. And now, all three branches of government are on board with this unconstitutional practice.

If true, is there a “smoking gun” document which proves the claim? There is not only a smoking gun document, there is a law that speaks to this matter very clearly. Further, there is a recent Supreme Court decision which affirms the government’s right to lock you up and throw away the key.

The Law That Obliterates Due Process

The passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) marks the codification of unconstitutional indefinite detention based on the whim of the ruling authority. Even some of the ultra-liberals are afraid of this Hitler-style law. There are not many publications more liberal than the Huffington Post. However, they are concerned and this is what they have to say about the NDAA:

These NDAA provisions (which have been re-approved by Congress and signed by President Obama every year since 2012) override habeas corpus―the essence of our justice system. Habeas corpus is the vital legal procedure that prevents the government from detaining you indefinitely without showing just cause. When you challenge your detention by filing a writ of habeas corpus, you must be promptly brought before a judge or into court, where lawful grounds must be shown for your detention or you must be released.

Under Section 1021, however, anyone who has committed a “belligerent act,” can be detained indefinitely, without charges or trial, as a “suspected terrorist.” This is a direct violation of the U.S. Constitution and our Bill or Rights. In The Federalist No. 84, Alexander Hamilton stressed the importance of the writ of habeas corpus to protect against “the favorite and most formidable instruments of tyranny.”

 Now the government can lock you up and throw away the key. I know that some will say that the Supreme Court would strike down this law if it were to be enforced. Well, as you will soon see, the Supreme Court just had an opportunity to do just that and they endorsed the practice as a result of their recent ruling in the Jennings v. Rodriguez case.

From Bad to Worse

As we have seen, even some of the liberals are frightened by the NDAA provisions for indefinite detention, by the subsequent realization that you can be locked away on the whim of the President with absolutely no due process rights. However, illegal immigrants cannot be locked away. At least they could not be prior to a recent Supreme Court decision. You simply will not believe this story.

Until recently, the courts have held the following, with regard to the indefinite detention of illegal aliens, as summarized by Cornell University Law School as recounted by the New York Times:

Courts have consistently held that anyone on United States soil is protected by the Constitution’s right to due process, even if they illegally entered the country, though people generally have greater legal protections inside the country than at the border.

How much process is deemed to be “due” depends on the situation. Courts have upheld that people who entered the United States illegally and were ordered deported have a right to appeal those decisions. But the courts have also essentially said that Congress can decide that more limited procedures are sufficient for noncitizens detained at the border.

My outrage, regarding the apparent two-tiered system of justice and Constitutional protections was summarized in the following. Illegal aliens do not deserve more legal protection from detention than US citizens when it comes to illegal detention.

However, this all changed as the Supreme Court recently ruled that immigration officials can indefinitely detain immigrants during subsequent immigration proceedings which are used to determine the legal status of an immigrant following arrest

In the 5-3 decision, in which Justice Elena Kagan abstained due to previous legal work which could have construed as a conflict of interest, the Supreme Court decision of Jennings v. Rodriguez affects both illegal and legal immigrants. This Supreme Court decision affirms the NDAA and the President’s right to detain anyone, for any reason as deemed necessary by some undefined principle. In other words, our due process rights are no longer guaranteed and exist at the whim of the President. The Supreme Court missed the opportunity to rule in favor of the Constitutional liberties as opposed to tyranny, and they did not.

Implications

I have no issue with illegal aliens being protected by the Constitution. When the government can determine whose rights to protect, then none of us are safe. However, and before the readers think I have gone “rogue liberal”, illegally crossing the border contains legal sanctions that are not being enforced (ie jail time). Illegal aliens, like US citizens, should not be immune to prosecution and the requirement to pay for their legal transgressions. Illegal aliens, despite what the sovereignty-destroying Democratic party says, cannot have it both ways. The law is clear, the Constitution should apply to everyone, but so should the consequences for law-breakers.

It should be clear by this point there are much bigger issues here than just the detention status of illegal aliens. American citizens are not safe. A rogue future President, say like a Hillary Clinton, could imprison people indefinitely without due process. People wonder why I seem to be so concerned with FEMA camps, I just told you the reason. And if the Executive Branch was not intent on giving itself the option to imprison those that disagree with them at some future date, then why train robots to shoot 50 caliber machine guns at a known FEMA camp facility? Why would the Supreme Court reverse lower court rulings which established that illegal aliens have Constitutional protections against indefinite detention? The Supreme Court ruling, without mentioning it, just affirmed the very alarming NDAA and the government’s right to detain you based on the whim of the leadership of the government. This is why I have gone from outrage at the lower court decisions to fear of my government with regard to the recent Supreme Court decision.

Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion in which he stated:

“Detention during those proceedings gives immigration officials time to determine an alien’s status without running the risk of the alien’s either absconding or engaging in criminal activity before a final decision can be made…” 

Justice Breyer wrote the dissenting opinion in which he argued the following:

“Whatever the fiction, would the Constitution leave the Government free to starve, beat, or lash those held within our boundaries? If not, then, whatever the fiction, how can the Constitution authorize the Government to imprison arbitrarily those who, whatever we might pretend, are in reality right here in the United States?”

Breyer also called the majority ruling “legal fiction.” Legal fiction? Is that what they are going to call it when the purge happens? Can anyone read this and believe that there is nothing to worry about. Unfortunately, there is no pill that can fix cognitive dissonance.

PREPARE WITH DAVE–  4 WEEKS OF $250 STORABLE FOOD ONLY $99

FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY

 

 
 From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. Take 5% off the cost of your order with coupon code DAVE5

From the Hagmann blood sugar protocol to the Hodges joint protocol, Dr. Broer has helped hundreds of thousands of people. There is something for everybody at Healthmasters.com. 

CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT MORE-  USE THE COUPON CODE   “CSS5” TO TAKE 5% OFF 

 

By | 2018-07-07T07:02:24+00:00 July 7th, 2018|Featured, Main, Martial Law|11 Comments

About the Author:

11 Comments

  1. gandhi July 7, 2018 at 10:01 am

    Shut up and take it slave! i mean Dave!

  2. Jeff Martin July 7, 2018 at 1:25 pm

    I can see one scenario where the Federal Government tells US citizens that the only safe place is in FEMA Camps. “We will take care of you there!”

    Yes, Americans are the “aliens” now. Just get on the buses!

  3. Jon July 7, 2018 at 2:41 pm

    I was taught in old school civic’s and American History class in high school that you only have Constitutional rights if you are an American Citizen. Other than that, you only have basic human rights! If these CRIMINAL, ILLEGAL, BORDER INVADERS who ARE invading our country illegally get caught and arrested, they suffer the consequences! They should be locked up for 5 years, no trial, nothing! Straight into a jail cell! After their 5 years, they are deported, if they come back into the US illegally again, it’s double the sentence! The third time, LIFE imprisonment! Why don’t you ANDtry to go into Mexico ILLEGALLY and see what happens to you! Screw these worthless leaches on society!

    EDITOR’S NOTE: I AGREE WITH YOU AS A MATTER OF OPINION. HOWEVER, THE COURTS HAVE HELD THE OPPOSITE. IN FACT, IT EVEN GOES FURTHER: FREE EDUCATION, WELFARE AND FREE MEDICAL. IDEALISM IS IN ONE DIMENSION OF THIS ISSUE. HOWEVER, COURTS HAVE HELD SOMETHING ENTIRELY DIFFERENT THAN WHAT YOU POSTED HERE.

  4. Lou Cypher July 7, 2018 at 3:47 pm

    Dave Hodges is wrong the Constitution only applies to American citizens. No where in the Constitution does it say otherwise. We might as well not be a nation then…. if illegals have same rights.Judges who rule that they have same rights should be removed and sent to FEMA camp.

  5. H.T. July 7, 2018 at 4:34 pm

    That Is Why We Have The Second Amendment And the Reason Why ‘they’ Want To Take It Away – Our public servants have become the “enemies within” Our Founders Warned US About.

    REGARDING OUR SUPREME COURT

    It must first be admitted that the U.S. Constitution never gave to the U.S. Supreme Court the power to substitute their will for the intentions of the Founders of the Constitution. This is easy to prove. Alexander Hamilton admits this in Federalist Paper 78:

    “It can be of no weight to say that the courts, on the pretense of a repugnancy, may substitute their own pleasure to the Constitutional intentions of the legislature … The courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUDGMENT, the consequence would equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body.”

    Here, Hamilton points out the fact that in Our Republic, the US Supreme Court MUST apply the Constitution to all federal laws as intended by the Founders. They are NOT to place their will above the will of those who framed and acceded to the US Constitution. To suggest that the US S CT has the power to alter, change or amend the Constitution at will is to place the US S CT above the Constitution: they can no more do this than the legislative branch can legally pass an UN-Constitutional ‘law’ or the executive branch legally carry out an UN-Constitutional ‘law’. Or as Hamilton puts it, putting their will above the Constitution will “equally be the substitution of their pleasure to that of the legislative body.” Neither is acceptable and neither is Constitutional/Lawful.

    The time has come in Our Republic to understand and acknowledge that the Power To Govern Ourselves Justly And Constitutionally Is And Has Always Been In the hands of the People of the several states of America–NOT in the hands of the People within the branches of federal government (public servants). What most People in America have been duped to believe is that the U.S. Supreme Court is the final arbiter in all matters concerning government actions related to Our Constitution/Supreme Law.

    When it comes to US S CT rulings that contradict the US Constitution and that reject the historical facts and principles of Our Republic, the People feel hopeless and think that regaining freedom somehow means replacing the “liberal” judges with “conservative” judges. Such an approach to “Preserving” Our freedom is not only UN-American; it is fruitless and ineffectual. History now proves this. Additionally, this approach proves that the vast majority of Americans have been indoctrinated into the centralist-ideology imposed on US by not-so-innocent advocates pushing such a political belief system.

    Let me state this clearly: the US Constitution does not grant to the US S CT the power to interpret Our Constitution in contradiction to the terms of the Constitution, and it does not strip the powers of the States to actively arrest and resist tyrannical federal actions. The US S CT can no more violate Our Constitution than the Legislative and Executive branches can. What sense does it make that the US S CT is bound by Oath to support and defend Our Constitution and then has the power to interpret it however the heck they want to? Do you think Our Founders were so near-sighted and unlearned that they would have given to the US S CT this unchecked and unlimited power in the very document that states its purpose is “to secure the blessings of liberty”?

    http://newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin528.htm

  6. Mike Fisch July 7, 2018 at 9:49 pm

    You are right about this, Dave. Equal protection under the law is constitutional and biblical:

    “When a foreigner lives with you in your land, you must not oppress him. You must regard the foreigner who lives with you as the native-born among you. You are to love him as yourself, for you were foreigners in the land of Egypt; I am Yahweh your God.” – Leviticus 19:33-34

  7. Phil July 8, 2018 at 1:28 am

    Then I guess now that the US Supreme Court is full of traitors isn’t it. I personally have no use for traitors and That puts scotus and anyone else that took the oath to defend the Constitution and are liars to the core. I used to have respect for SCOTUS but not anymore.

  8. gene July 8, 2018 at 5:47 am

    I think the newspapers that withheld the truth obstructed justice , Corporations are not people and their greed is harming Americas citizens, polluting our land , air . water & health. Please do a complete job of draining the swamp . These insane murders and evil worshipers need to know that treason is a capital crime and the full weight of justice will be on them all.

  9. George C July 8, 2018 at 6:36 am

    Seems to me that when the “asset forfeiture” laws were approved as OK and legal, it pretty much gave the the government a free hand to do anything they wanted, and the citizens have no say-so, no matter the constitution. If gov. is allowed to side step even one law of the constitution, the the entire constitution is rendered no longer valid. Our country, as the real America, no longer exists. I grew up in the 50’s and actually experienced living in the real America. The country I’m living in today just needs to change it’s name to reflect the system of government we now live under (???), which no longer even recognizes the constitution as a valid document. Good bye my America, it was a great ride, while it lasted.

  10. Vietkonggook July 8, 2018 at 8:53 am

    The secret societies do have a time table to completely achieve their goal of a One World Govt, One World Religion and One WOrld Monetary System aka International order under the umbrella of a United Nations flag. To reach this end they have to destruct America from within. And they are near damn near it until Trump showed up to slow it down.
    This new awakening of patriotism in America they cannot allow to stay for long. They have to resort to their masterplan and that could only spell a giant false flag or economic collapse in order for them to activate NDAA FEMA ending in Georgia Guidestones scenario. The fact Trump kept telling us he will make sure our 2nd A is not compromised, he knows what the plans of the demon rats, deep state and shadow govt are up to.

    Looking back to Act of 1871 the establishment of Washington DC ( a Vatican corporate headquarters), we have now reached 147 yrs since that time. You can be sure the deep state have something up their sleeves to keep America from waking further up.

    https://www.facebook.com/mark.maxwell.39904

  11. StanS July 9, 2018 at 1:22 am

    Anent the business about “Obama-appointed judges,” the answer is very simple:

    Pres. Trump, as a co-equal branch of the federal government, declares Obama to have been the ineligible occupant of the office of POTUS that he was; and that way, all of the legislation that the Usurper signed into law, and all of the E.O.’s and P.D.’s that he issued, and all of the appointments that he made – including to the SCOTUS, and inferior courts – go with him. Into the trash bin. For it to be as though he had never been in that thus-dishonored office. For, he was never there legally.

    The basis is that he was, and is, not a “natural born” citizen; which, according to the definition of the term extant at the time that it was put into the Constitution as an eligibility requirement for that particular office (and that particular federal office ONLY; indicating its special nature in the eyes of the constitutional Framers), is a person “born in the country, of parents who are citizens” thereof. The whole POINT of the exercise having been to make sure that the occupant of that office – who would as well, then, become the Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces; which was the specific concern of the Framers for putting that requirement in there – had NO DUAL OR OTHERWISE CONFLICTING LOYALTIES OR ALLEGIANCES OR INFLUENCES. Had SOLE ALLEGIANCE to the United States. The definition of the term is from the definitive tome of the day on such nation-building matters, E. de Vattel’s ‘The Law of Nations’ (for which there is ample historical evidence that that was the source of their understanding of the term). And that eligibility requirement for that particular office STILL STANDS, absent a constitutional amendment to the contrary.

    It is no wonder that this country has deviated away from its founding roots, when we find such facts as how both major political parties of our day engaged in collusion in this terribly important matter, to make it easier for them to put up candidates for that office who did not constitutionally qualify for it (as the Republican Party subsequently did, with the candidacies of the likes of Sens. Ted Cruz and Macro Rubio; neither of them a NBC), and have tried to get away with their end-around play on the Constitution and the American people on the matter with their control, between them, of the MSM in this country. Fortunately, we now have the Internet, to get around the control of us by those who are attempting to bring down this country, and make of it merely a part of a region of their totalitarian global superstate New World Order. It’s time for We the People now to take back our country from their clutches. And just IN time, it would increasingly appear.

Comments are closed.