Does a nation have a right to self-defense? Does a nation have a right to develop and enforce its own immigration laws? Does a nation have a right, and duty, to provide for the preservation of the safety and welfare of its country? Does a nation continue to be a nation if it has no borders? According to the Democrats the answer is no. Well, let’s ask the Democrats another question: Shouldn’t their party vigorously defend the very people that they purport to support? We will answer that question in last section of this article. The answer to that question, as presented through the hypocritical stance of AZ Senatorial candidate, Kyrsten Sinema, whose positions are surprising and shocking as she is openly betraying the very people she and her party say they support.
If You Support Sane Border Policies, You Could NEVER Vote for a Democrat
Members of the American military, specifically and generally, the National Guard, have historically supported domestic operations in times of emergencies following such catastrophes as hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes and other natural disasters. Further, troops have been deployed when domestic agencies (eg Homeland Security, Customs and Border Patrol or Immigration and Customs Enforcement) need tactical support. In these instances, I have never heard one Democrat complain about the deployment of military assets to protect the safety and welfare of the public in these instances. However, when the national security of the United States is threatened by individuals and groups that mean our people harm, the Democrats are screaming bloody murder.
These kinds of ridiculous allegations have led Defense Secretary Mattis to state the following to US News and World Report accused President Trump as engaging in a political stunt to immediately precede the midterm elections:
“We don’t do stunts,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said Wednesday when asked about critics’ claims that Trump is using the deployment to bolster support ahead of the Nov. 6 midterms. “We are there in support of the secretary of homeland security, who needs additional military assistance. We do this following storms, we do this in support of the Department of Homeland Security. This is a different aspect of it, but that’s what we are doing.”
Along these same lines, the United Nations did not blink an eye when American military soldiers showed up in Malaysia following the horrific tsunami that claimed so many innocent lives. The United Nations has never spoke a negative word when US troops have showed up at earthquakes and any other natural disaster. Then why is the United Nation COMMANDING President Trump to admit each and every migrant that threatens to violently storm our borders as they did on the Mexican-Guatemalan border?
The documentation which supports the notion that these migrant forces are overrun with terrorists and members of the gang cartels and this has even been definitively reported in the mainstream media (eg Fox News). Leaked documents have shown that George Soros, on behalf of the Deep State Democrats, is bankrolling the transport, feeding and the clothing of these migrant people. Yet, the Democrats lend their unqualified support to this pending invasion. Why don’t the Mexicans take these “desperate people if there such a dire need? Why isn’t the UN on the scene providing humanitarian aid and sanctuary? Why did didn’t Guatemala take some of that $340 million in US foreign aid, and provide for these people before they somehow found it necessary to come north and invade the United States? Why?
The Prime Directive of the Democratic Party
Before exposing the prime directive of the Democratic Party, let’s let their actions speak louder than their words.
The Democrats by their own admission favor the following:
- The elimination of ICE. This is a declaration of war against the youth of our country as ICE is the frontline defense against drug trafficking into the country.
- According to the premiere sex trafficking researcher, Liz Crokin, ICE interdicts human smugglers and many in the Democratic Party are complicit in this operation. Liz’s interview is playing tonight on Global Star Radio Network.
- The extreme left, as manifested in the Democratic Party, are against the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment…in other words, the Democrats are against all civil liberties on behalf of everyone who is in disagreement with their Marxist governmental policies.
- Elizabeth Warren and Alexandra Ocasio Cortez have openly advocated for the governmental takeover of private business. Can the abolition of private property ownership be far behind?
- Trevor Louden, in Enemies Within, completely documented the participation of 80 Congressional Democrats who are active in front groups for the American Communist Party and the world’s biggest terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood. People who are relatively new to the CSS, may not know that Obama’s half-brother, Malik Obama, is in charge of weapons procurement and finance for the Muslim Brotherhood. This is something that researchers like myself exposed in Obama’s first term, and Obama has never addressed this issue.
- The Democratic Party has historically championed the rights of Blacks, Latinos, working women and gays. Yet, when we examine the gains made by all groups in the economic sector, which is reflective of polices promoting equality, it took a Republican to provide Blacks, Latinos and working women the lowest unemployment rate in recorded history. And with regard to gays, please allow me to use self-declared Kyrsten Sinema as the shining example of how the Democrats turns its backs on gay people when it is politically expedient to do so.
The prime directive of the Democratic Party is the evisceration of civil liberties, free enterprise and the elimination of the Constitution of the United States. However, the democrats cannot even defend those that they say they support. Democrat, Kyrsten Sinema is the case in point.
Kyrsten Sinema Is a Traitor to Her Own
Kyrsten Sinema has repeatedly declared in the past that she is bisexual. Isn’t this the type of people that the Democrats purport to support at all costs. Aren’t the Democrats the party that vigorously defends the rights of the LGBT? Unfortunately, the LGBT community is being sold out by one of their own. Here is the story:
In Sinema’s own words:
Sinema has been a huge advocate for LGBT rights, making some of her biggest legislative accomplishments in that area. Her “political coming out” came from an attempt to do just that; in 2005, after a Republican colleague made a speech insulting gays and lesbians, she says she told her colleagues “Duh, I’m bisexual” in an “impassioned rebuttal” where she insisted “We’re simply people like everyone else and we deserve respect.”
From NPR on January 1, 2013:
Arizona’s new 9th Congressional District is sending a different type of representative to Washington this week: She’s young — 36. She grew up homeless for a time. And she’ll be the first openly bisexual member of Congress.
Democrat Kyrsten Sinema marvels at the number of women, minorities and members of the LGBT community who will join her in the freshman class, which will be sworn in Thursday.
The point of this section of the article is not to establish the fact that Kyrsten Sinema is bisexual, she is. I don’t care who she sleeps with. I care about her perception. This fact should not preclude her from running for and holding public office. In fact, this revelation should not be the basis for any kind of exclusion or discrimination. However, when one runs for public office, the public has an expectation that the person be true to who they are and Sinema has gone strangely silent on her defense and participation of the LGBT movement.
Peter denied Jesus three times on the eve of the Crucifixation. In her Senatorial campaign, Sinema has denied the rights of the LGBT movement every time she promotes her campaign. When running for office in state government, Sinema was an outspoken advocate of LGBT. Why? What has changed?
Go to Sinema’s campaign platform and there is nothing about the topic being discussed in this section.
In typical Democratic fashion, Sinema is masquerading as a centrist Democrat to appeal to the independent vote. Therefore, she feels she cannot discuss LGBT issues. This is concealment through omission. f I was a member of the LGBT movement, I would not vote for her based on this alone How insincere and hypocritical is that?
And just like a typical Democrat, she speaks out of all four sides of her mouth. She says she’s for border security. She claims to support our veterans. However, the McSally campaign, her Senatorial opponent has produced recordings of Sinema saying it was ok to support the Taliban after 911. Further, she has provided material assistance for groups promoting the illegal transport of illegal migrant children for the purposes of child sex trafficking. She supports sanctuary cities which harbor illegal aliens who have murdered American citizens.
There is nothing wrong with Sinema. She is a typical deceitful Democrat who is desperately trying to conceal her past, her beliefs and agenda to take down the United States as we know it.
Oh, and one more thing about Sinema. she is one of these 80 Democrats who are affiliated with front groups for the American Communist Party and/or the Muslim Brotherhood.
This article is only a snapshot of the Democratic Party. This is the tip of the proverbial iceberg. How can anyone who says they love America vote for a Democrat? If politicians like Sinema will deny their own, how can you trust anything they say?
Please share this with a Democrat.
THE ARCHIVES FOR THE COMMON SENSE SHOW ARE NOW AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD ON I-TUNES, GOOGLE PLAY AND SPOTIFY!!!
Promo code CSS5 to take 5% off