/, United States/Gun Free Zones Are Where Victims Go to Die
Gun Free Zones Are Where Victims Go to Die

sandy hookThe Batman Aurora, Colorado shooting this past summer was clearly the work of a mind controlled Manchurian candidate. It is obvious that many of these mass shootings follow the same pattern and cumulatively, they serve the same purpose of justifying the need for gun confiscation.

Out of respect for the families and friends of the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting victims, I will refrain from speculation, for the time being as to the motives behind this senseless tragedy. However, it should be pointed out that the Obama gun control forces and the state-run media have been ramping up the rhetoric in favor of gun confiscation and subsequently, THEY are the ones who are exploiting this horrible tragedy in pursuit of their own gun confiscation agenda. Let it be clearly stated, right here and right now, that our current president could not even grant the victims’ families a moment to grieve before calling for his version of draconian gun confiscation. Unqualified members of the mainstream media have also been piling on as exemplified by sportscaster, Bob Costas. While broadcasting a football game, Costas could not resist stepping into a realm he knows nothing about as he called for a gun ban while broadcasting a recent NFL game. The liberal media is incessant in its call for gun confiscation. Even Harry Belafonte is telling Obama to arrest dissenters like they would in a third world country.

I hate to confuse the gun control advocates with the facts, but nearly every infamous mass shooting occurs in a gun free zone where even the legal conceal and carry of firearms is prevented. The very notion of gun-free zones are based on an erroneous principle, namely, that murderers will follow the rules. This flawed logic is an insult to all law-abiding citizens.

armed israeli teachersDoes anyone doubt the fact that any of the family members of the Newton, Connecticut shootings, wish that the teachers, administrators and security were armed with guns on the morning of December 14, 2012. How many lives could have been saved if we armed school personnel in previously gun free zones? The Israeli’s spare no expense in defending their children from these heinous acts. In Israel, teachers carry guns. In America, thanks to the notion of gun free zones, Americans leaves its children defenseless.

The average police response time, in America, is six minutes and the average draw-and-shoot response time for a concealed carry weapons holder is five seconds.As flawed as the anti-gun advocates logic is, the fact remains that the more guns that a community possess, the lower the violent crime rate. This point is clearly illustrated when a reasonable person compares Germany to Switzerland and discovers that gun ownership is three times as high in Switzerland, yet the Swiss have a much lower murder rate. This is also true in rural areas in the United States, which have historically higher rates of gun ownership, yet have far lower murder rates. Further, gun ownership doubled in the late 20th century followed by a decreasing murder rate. Stricter gun laws create more death, just look at the astronomical homicide rates in Washington DC, New York City and Chicago. Yet, these facts are rarely commentated on in the media. And speaking of the media, there was another shooting in Aurora, Colorado, other than the Aurora, CO. Batman shooting. Unbelievably, the mainstream media chose to ignore this event because the hero of the story stopped, what could have been, a massive tragedy, through the use of his gun that he had on his person at the time of the attack.

parker 2On April 22, 2012, Kiarron Parker, recently released from prison, sped into the parking lot of an Aurora, Colorado church and shot and killed one of the members of the congregation, Josephine Echols.  Perhaps, the gun control advocates of the corporate controlled media failed to report that Parker’s murderous rampage, was cut short by Antonio Milow, an off-duty Denver policeman, as this hero drew his concealed revolver from its holster, took aim and saved several lives of innocent churchgoers by taking Parker down. Isn’t it a shame that Antonio Milow was not in theater number nine, at the Century 16, on July 20, 2012? Isn’t it tragic that Milow was not present at the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting? How many lives could Antonio Milow, or some other CCW armed person like him, have saved on those fateful nights in both Aurora, CO. and Newton, CT? .

In a move that could be described as grandstanding, Obama visited the victims of the Aurora shooting.  Why didn’t Barack Obama visit the Josephine Echols’ family, or call them, or at least e-mailed his condolences? The simple answer is that Obama doesn’t want the uninformed public seeing that an armed populace is much more safe than depending on law enforcement. Isn’t it interesting that this Aurora church tragedy was conveniently ignored by ABC, NBC, Fox, CNN and CBS and in large part, the local affiliates in Aurora, CO?

I literally became nauseous as I watched Obama launch into his fake crying routine in his December 14, 2012 address to the nation over the most recent mass shooting.


This is the same Obama whose Predator drones kill thousands of Afghan children without blinking an eye. This is the same tearful Obama who has shipped 40,000 guns, under Fast and Furious, into Mexico which has resulted in the deaths of three US Border Patrol Agents, 200 other Americans and tens of thousands of Mexicans, including children. Where’s Obama’s tears for these poor souls?


Obama's Fake Tears

Obama’s Fake Tears

Fast and Furious was clearly orchestrated to undermine the Second Amendment. Who is this illegitimate president kidding? Obama has never visited the families of the three slain Border Patrol Agents (e.g. Agent Brian Terry), yet, as he did after the Batman shootings, and you can bet he will visit the families of Sandy Hook victims because he can exploit the situation in the furtherance of his gun confiscation agenda. And why is Obama so hell-bent on getting our guns? Simple, a disarmed population offers less resistance to a totalitarian takeover of the government. More on this point in a future article.

It has been said that guns are to crime as to what gasoline is to drunk driving. Gasoline does not cause drunk driving. Guns do not cause crime. Are most Americans really stupid enough to believe that there was no crime before the advent of gunpowder? Sadly, I am afraid that they are. And as long as our abject ignorance persists, gun free zones is where victims will continue to be murdered.

As tragic as the mass shootings are, gun confiscation will do nothing to prevent further tragedy and gun confiscation will surely serve to threaten every freedom-loving American

I pray that God brings peace of mind to the survivors of this tragedy. May the Lord also bring some measure of comfort and ease the pain of the victims famiies. And may He keep the souls of the victims with Him forever and ever,  Sandy Hook elementary school families, the nation cries with you tonight.


By | 2017-10-26T22:15:58+00:00 December 15th, 2012|Conspiracy, United States|13 Comments

About the Author:


  1. Shields December 16, 2012 at 8:22 am

    Don’t care about respect, I care about the truth. This was staged end of story, and still not giving up my rights no matter how many die.

    You want respect, don;t cry or complain when you asked to be in a victim zone.

  2. escapefromobamastan December 16, 2012 at 9:41 am

    Thanks. You just said it all.

  3. bobd76 December 16, 2012 at 12:36 pm

    I have a habit of reviewing TV programming the day before in order to set my DVR. MSNBC airs Lawrence O’donell’s show at 10 PM Mon-Thurs, on Friday he is off and Lock Up, a prison show, is on from 10PM-6AM. When there is big news Lawrence will air on Friday followed by a rerun schedule of Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow, Chris Mathews and Lawrence again. This past Thursday night the schedule showed this “big story” line-up without any big story that I was aware of for Friday night’s schedule. Friday morning this tragedy occurs. Next week’s schedule is back to Lock Up for eight hours. If I had a suspicious nature I might think that MSNBC knew that something of great importance was going to happen the next day. Perhaps another mind controlled shooter?


  4. Douglas Nusbaum December 16, 2012 at 1:36 pm

    go here and sign my petition


    1. Laws do not keep crazy people from obtaining firearms
    2. Words have no magical properties. Saying that an area is a Gun Free
    zone, does not make it a Gun free zone.
    3. Given tens of millions of people, it is impossible to find every possible
    crazy person out there who might, in the future, decide that they want to
    kill many people with minimum risk to their success.
    4. No individual has EVER gone into a police bar, or police station, and
    committed mass murder.

    Thus I petition that the president encourage, at a state level, in line with
    the US constitution, that all states encourage their schools to have at least
    one staff member be trained to use and carry a firearm while at work at
    school, or to hire such a person who could also be a clerk or otherwise do
    useful work.

  5. azgirl7 December 16, 2012 at 2:08 pm

    “gun confiscation will surely serve to threaten every freedom-loving American”.

    Dave, as far as gun confiscation is concerned, defending my freedom is the least of my concerns. How about defending my LIFE ?? As a single woman living alone, I’d rather die by cop or soldier when they TRY to take my gun, than be at the mercy of a roving criminal flash mob who breaks into my home in the middle of the night.

    I may not have a man in bed with me, but I do not sleep without ‘company’.

  6. Who Wudda Thunk It December 16, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    Sad what happened, but Yeah, those big bad ol’ guns are just a terrible thing.. But think about this for a minute. How about those US Predator Drones flying over seas dropping bombs from the sky on plenty of innocent people as well. Some children, some women, some elderly become dead victims as well. But that is just fine with our Government. Maybe because of Media sensorship, we cannot see the photos of carnage and terror those people face when a Drone Bomb hits out of nowhere. I wonder if Obama cries crocodile tears at night for the foreign families of those he bombs, kills and maims. Or do we just label those foreign (children, women and elderly) as terrorist also by association? None of it is justified and should all be considered terrorism.

  7. sn December 16, 2012 at 3:55 pm

    The fact that there actually are “gun free zones” tells you all you need to know about
    how you government “elites” see you….as cattle. Words DO mean things.
    “The very fact that the Regime wants us disarmed confirms the necessity to be armed.” – Thomas Moore

  8. jim December 16, 2012 at 3:57 pm

    So your answer is that teachers and perhaps 6 year olds should carry loaded guns. A stupid response by paranoid wackos. May you someday face an armed wacko like this one wearing a bullet proof vest. Perhaps you will survive long enough to realize how much of an ass you have been espousing.

  9. Dave Hodges December 16, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    I love it when trolls come to my site. I am going to post your comment, as inane as it is, because people can see through the logic of gun confiscation advocates. Meanwhile, I would suggest that you go back and reread the article because you obviously did not, or cannot read. Schools need to have armed guards. And yes, I am espousing the arming of teachers. They do it in Israel and do not have school shootings. The other option is to keep leaving them defenseless.

  10. Jim December 17, 2012 at 11:49 am

    Let’s say we decide to allow administrators carry firearms. And let’s say it deters a shooter. So what would that do?
    Administrators would be required to carry a gun and be willing to use it. That would require gun classes. And, from time to time, an innocent person would be injured or killed. That administrator would have to live with that, and the district would have to handle the lawsuit.
    Since the school is on longer a soft target, the shooter would likely look for another place with a lot of people. This would be a good argument for the general public to carry firearms for general protection.
    Which means training for concealed carrry, ocassional shooting of innocent people, including the gun owner. And, if somenone did start shooting, others would likely open fire, making them a possible mistaken target as a shooter.
    So we do all of this to protect the right to bear arms?

  11. Frank Costa December 17, 2012 at 7:07 pm

    In Columbine witnesses said there were adults going into the building carrying duffel bags; at noon, with their assassinated bodies on the library floor, the gun fire continued for hours.
    In Aurora, who let the shooter(s) in the back stage door? Where were the bodies or proof of any killing at all? Two ambulances for all the carnage? No pics of a blood spattered theater??
    In Tucson the “Gifford”supposed shooting is filled with discrepancies.
    Now in Conn another masked shooter is ID’ed by only the police. His rifle was in a car. How do we know he killed his mom? They said his mom worked for the school, she didn’t. What pharmaceuticals was he on and by what doctor? We’ve been led by fear since 9/11 and it won’t quit till we take action against our rogue government.

  12. Anon Patriot December 17, 2012 at 11:42 pm

    Connecticut’s Strict Gun Control Laws Did Not Stop the School Shootings in Newtown, CT


    Democrat From NY: To Get Gun Control, Obama Must ‘Exploit’ CT Shooting

    List of school shootings known to be linked to SSRIs

    Gee, I wonder, is there maybe a link, between BIG PHARMA, and guns being blamed for all these heavily-medicated mass killing sprees? Of course, if you want to take away ALL Americans’ liberties – you first, must take away their ability to defend themselves.

    Gun-Town USA: 25 Years Murder Free

    Media Blackout: Oregon Mall Shooter Was Stopped By An Armed Citizen Sunday, December 16, 2012 9:02

  13. Steve December 31, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    The constitution (Bill of Rights) included “The Right to Keep and Bear Arms” because of the experience and education of the Founding Fathers. They knew their history (something “liberalism” has continuously stripped out of America’s schools for decades in favor of political correctness, and correct condom use classes).

    History is very explicit!


    Many “reasons” are given for confiscation of Arms. All of which are manufactured to mask the true purpose.

    The Founding Fathers included The Right to Keep and Bear Arms so WE, citizens of The United States, could defend ourselves from OUR government, if our government became corrupt enough to force its will on us. In short The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is OUR defense, against an out-of-control government.

    It should make all thinking Americans STOP … and … THINK … when that government, for which The Right to Keep and Bear Arms was established, tries to take away our Arms, leaving us defenseless.



Comments are closed.